2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Motivational Interviewing and Traditional Practices to Address Alcohol and Drug Use Among Urban American Indian/Alaska Native Youth

Abstract: American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) exhibit high levels of alcohol and drug (AOD) use and problems. Although approximately 70% of AI/ANs reside in urban areas, few culturally relevant AOD use programs targeting urban AI/AN youth exist. Furthermore, federally-funded studies focused on the integration of evidence-based treatments with AI/AN traditional practices are limited. The current study addresses a critical gap in the delivery of culturally appropriate AOD use programs for urban AI/AN youth, and outlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted focus groups (FGs) in two large urban communities located in northern and southern California that provide services to the AI/AN community (Dickerson et al, 2015). We collaborated with community representatives to plan focus groups, including the sampling approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conducted focus groups (FGs) in two large urban communities located in northern and southern California that provide services to the AI/AN community (Dickerson et al, 2015). We collaborated with community representatives to plan focus groups, including the sampling approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal during the focus groups was to inform the development of a culturally relevant and developmentally appropriate AOD intervention for urban AI/AN youth. This paper focuses specifically on focus group discussions of Native cultural identity; the details of intervention development are discussed elsewhere (Dickerson, Brown, Johnson, Schweigman, & D’Amico, 2015). The advantages of this CBPR approach to exploring AI/AN cultural identity (and its utility for intervention development) include discovering and leveraging common experience and building a platform for “deep” (as opposed to surface level) cultural adaptation of prevention and intervention efforts (Jumper-Reeves, et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI may be particularly useful in AI/AN populations when cultural adaptions are made to: use AI/AN therapists, emphasize respect for the study participant’s language and spirituality, their relationship with extended family and clan, as well as their tribes’ unique history and culture (Venner et al, 2016). Several groups have developed methodology to implement MI in AI/AN populations as well as demonstrate its acceptance by AI/AN communities (Dickerson, Brown, Johnson, Schweigman, & D’Amico, 2016; Gilder et al, 2011; Venner, Feldstein, & Tafoya, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of evidence-based treatments in substance abuse treatment programs serving AI/AN communities found that only two treatments, MI and Relapse Prevention Therapy, were deemed culturally appropriate by the programs that had utilized them (Dickerson et al, 2016; Novins, Croy, Moore, & Rieckmann, 2016; Spillane, Greenfield, Venner, & Kahler, 2015). For this reason, there have been several groups that have begun to develop programs to incorporate MI within a framework of treatment for substance use disorders in AI/AN health care settings (Dickerson et al, 2016; Gilder et al, 2013; Venner et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation