2020
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating motives and usability to examine community crowdsourcing

Abstract: Integrating the notions of public service and intrinsic motivations with usability factors, this study examined the motivational and usability factors influencing intention to help via a community crowdsourcing app. Hierarchical linear regression analysis indicated that creating an engaging and useful app that appeals to needs for commitment, and intrinsic needs to participate in valuable acts motivated users to use the community crowdsourcing app to help others.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Community crowdsourcing is often referenced and discussed among the various types of crowdsourcing ( Funk et al., 2019 ; Lee et al., 2020 ; Ludwig et al., 2017 ; Mathews et al., 2018 ; Sasao et al., 2017 ), and is now broadly combined with recommender systems. For example, Yuen et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Community crowdsourcing is often referenced and discussed among the various types of crowdsourcing ( Funk et al., 2019 ; Lee et al., 2020 ; Ludwig et al., 2017 ; Mathews et al., 2018 ; Sasao et al., 2017 ), and is now broadly combined with recommender systems. For example, Yuen et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various types of crowdsourcing, community crowdsourcing is often referenced and discussed ( Funk et al., 2019 ; Lee et al., 2020 ; Ludwig et al., 2017 ; Mathews et al., 2018 ; Sasao et al., 2017 ). Community crowdsourcing is defined as a form of crowdsourcing where participants work as a community to address problems together ( Nguyen et al., 2016 ) ( Collection et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%