2018
DOI: 10.1115/1.4040266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Operator Information for Manual Grinding and Characterization of Process Performance Based on Operator Profile

Abstract: Due to its high versatility and scalability, manual grinding is an important and widely used technology in production for rework, repair, deburring, and finishing of large or unique parts. To make the process more interactive and reliable, manual grinding needs to incorporate “skill-based design,” which models a person-based system and can go significantly beyond the considerations of traditional human factors and ergonomics to encompass both processing parameters (e.g., feed rate, tool path, applied forces, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, they are more difficult to predict. Other influences such as the wear of the grinding disc [1], state of charge of the battery in hand-held cordless grinders, and lower stiffness of the tools complicate the prediction. The comparison with the prediction of body forces and movements such as knee joint forces (KJF) with one or more IMUs shows a similar approach (leave-one-out cross-validation and classical and deep learning approaches) for regression [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With The State Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, they are more difficult to predict. Other influences such as the wear of the grinding disc [1], state of charge of the battery in hand-held cordless grinders, and lower stiffness of the tools complicate the prediction. The comparison with the prediction of body forces and movements such as knee joint forces (KJF) with one or more IMUs shows a similar approach (leave-one-out cross-validation and classical and deep learning approaches) for regression [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results With The State Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high accuracies can be explained by the fact that the grinding normal force has a physical relation with the torque of the hand-held grinding machine and, thus, with the current of the motor of the grinding machine [19]. The grinding tangential force is dependent on the grinding normal force via the friction coefficient between tool and workpiece [1]. The prediction of the axial force for cutting with a cut-off wheel (rMAE = 566.95% and r = 0.13) seems not feasible.…”
Section: Application Mae [N] Rmae [%] R Mae [N] Rmae [%] R Mae [N] Rmae [%] Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Manufacturing processes include many variables, and adjustments in one variable can greatly influence OP and product quality. Moreover, OP can be difficult to quantify accurately since it frequently requires subjective judgments about the quality of work [4]. Lastly, the lack of a standardised method to monitor OP across sectors can make comparing performance data and identifying best practices challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%