2006
DOI: 10.1177/1049909106290242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Palliative Care: A Postmodern Perspective

Abstract: Hospice and palliative care philosophy is becoming increasingly incorporated into medical practice, education, and research. However, this process of integration may be hindered by continued adherence to several perceived conceptual dichotomies: natural and medicalized death, research and clinical care, and acceptance and denial of dying. These dichotomies were perhaps essential for the initial development of palliative care but could undermine the continuing evolution of care for the terminally ill. In this a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In drawing attention to another binary opposition, almost 20 years ago, James and Field (1992) warned of the unintended consequences that may follow as palliative care became 'routinised' and (re)incorporated into the mainstream, noting that the root strength of the hospice movement as originally conceptualised by Saunders and colleagues was its specific focus on the care of the terminally ill cancer patient. It is now time to move beyond these and the other dichotomies (for example, 'comfort' versus 'cure') that have been so characteristic of palliative care in the twentieth century (Zimmerman & Wennberg, 2006) so that the benefits of palliative and end-of-life care reach the rapidly increasing and diverse groups of people in need. This paper has used the evolution of English palliative and end-oflife care policy as a case study to illustrate the complex factors which need to be addressed to effect this transformation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Forecasting the Futurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In drawing attention to another binary opposition, almost 20 years ago, James and Field (1992) warned of the unintended consequences that may follow as palliative care became 'routinised' and (re)incorporated into the mainstream, noting that the root strength of the hospice movement as originally conceptualised by Saunders and colleagues was its specific focus on the care of the terminally ill cancer patient. It is now time to move beyond these and the other dichotomies (for example, 'comfort' versus 'cure') that have been so characteristic of palliative care in the twentieth century (Zimmerman & Wennberg, 2006) so that the benefits of palliative and end-of-life care reach the rapidly increasing and diverse groups of people in need. This paper has used the evolution of English palliative and end-oflife care policy as a case study to illustrate the complex factors which need to be addressed to effect this transformation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Forecasting the Futurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Death anxiety has been found to be common in patients with advanced cancer (18) and its relief may be considered a primary goal of palliative care in this population (19). Death anxiety has been associated with negative outcomes, including impaired quality of life and psychiatric comorbidities such as depression and generalized anxiety (20,21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea, that family medicine, which is associated with whole-person care, is somehow less than specialties that are more disease-focused, reinforces the idea that the patient-centered, care-based approach is less valuable than the disease-focused, cure-based approach. The perceived dichotomy between the two approaches has created a barrier that could make it difficult for medical students and physicians to integrate psychosocial aspects of patient care into the prevailing disease-based model (De Valck et al 2001 ; Zimmermann and Wennberg 2006 ).…”
Section: Dichotomous Languagementioning
confidence: 99%