2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating QTL and high-density SNP analyses in mice to identify Insig2 as a susceptibility gene for plasma cholesterol levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
120
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SNP genotype data were collected primarily from three sources: GNF (Wiltshire et al 2003), Rosetta/ Merck (Cervino et al 2005), and the Broad Institute (http://www.broad.mit.edu/$mjdaly/mousehapmap). All SNP locations were mapped to NCBIM33.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SNP genotype data were collected primarily from three sources: GNF (Wiltshire et al 2003), Rosetta/ Merck (Cervino et al 2005), and the Broad Institute (http://www.broad.mit.edu/$mjdaly/mousehapmap). All SNP locations were mapped to NCBIM33.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several research groups have investigated the use of a panel of diverse inbred strains of mice (Bogue and Grubb 2004) (collectively referred to here as the mouse diversity panel, MDP) for these QTL mapping studies (Grupe et al 2001;Liao et al 2004;Pletcher et al 2004;Cervino et al 2005). In contrast to mapping populations derived from controlled crosses, the strains of the MDP have been derived over the past century of semistructured breeding and inbreeding (Beck et al 2000).…”
Section: T He Use Of Modern Genetics In Model Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, associating breedspecific genotypes with ''fixed'' phenotypes in multiple breeds (across-breed mapping) presents a powerful tool for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL) that may form the genetic basis for the phenotypic diversity observed in dog breeds. Similar approaches have been described using inbred mouse strains (Grupe et al 2001;Liao et al 2004;Pletcher et al 2004;Wang et al 2005), and these have 1 been combined with classical QTL analysis (Park et al 2003;Dipetrillo et al 2004;Wang et al 2004;Cervino et al 2005). However, the number of inbred mouse lines available are far fewer than the number of dog breeds, and the number of phenotypes offered by mice much fewer than what is offered by the nearly 300 breeds of domestic dog.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, as demonstrated recently, the increasing availability of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) maps of mice and consecutive in silico QTL mapping approaches may ultimately lead to the identification of susceptibility genes for complex traits. [6][7][8] As a systematic approach is necessary to identify candidate regions for such further analysis, we have performed a meta-analysis on 34 independent genome-wide scans in mice for obesity-related traits using the truncated product method. 9 Our analysis of 162 non-redundant QTL for body weight and 117 QTL for fat weight and body fat percentage reveals several major regions on chromosomes 1, 2, 7, 11, 15, and 17 that appear to be involved in the control of body weight and adiposity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%