2012
DOI: 10.18261/issn1891-814x-2012-03-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Tools to Monitor the Obligation to Fulfil Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: the OPERA Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The panellists’ selection of indicators derived from disaggregated information shows that they judged these more detailed indicators as critical in assessing the right to health, in particular the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age, sex, etc. This is consistent with the literature on human rights indicators which overwhelmingly recommends the use of disaggregated information if and when possible [ 8 , 10 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The panellists’ selection of indicators derived from disaggregated information shows that they judged these more detailed indicators as critical in assessing the right to health, in particular the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age, sex, etc. This is consistent with the literature on human rights indicators which overwhelmingly recommends the use of disaggregated information if and when possible [ 8 , 10 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, since the publication of General Comment 14 – the interpretative guidance issued by the body responsible for implementation and monitoring of the Covenant [ 5 ] – efforts have focused on developing new methods, including the construction of indicators to measure implementation [ 5 ]. Landmark studies conducted by human rights experts include a list of 72 indicators, [ 7 ] the OPERA framework, [ 8 ] and the social and economic rights fulfilment index (SERF index) [ 9 ]. So far, these attempts have focused on measuring implementation of the right to health in general, [ 7 ] and of the right to health applied to maternal health, [ 10 , 11 ] infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, [ 12 ] access to essential medicines, [ 13 ] or focusing on methods to determine what level of rights fulfilment is achievable for any given level of resources [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless public health researchers also access legal journals, they may miss important articles that are relevant to the evaluation and monitoring of the right to health. For example, we found several key articles in legal databases that are influential in human rights research, such as research commissioned by the UN Development Programme in 2001, or the publication of the OPERA framework and the SERF index in 2012 [43][44][45]. We did not detect any article in the public health literature discussing the challenges in using indicators to monitor human rights, whereas this debate is significant in legal journals [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%