Integrating quantitative morphological and qualitative molecular methods to analyse soil nematode community responses to plant range expansion

Abstract

Abstract1. Below-ground nematodes are important for soil functioning, as they are ubiquitous and operate at various trophic levels in the soil food web. However, morphological nematode community analysis is time consuming and requires ample training. qPCR-based nematode identification techniques are well available, but high-throughput sequencing (HTS) might be more suitable for non-targeted nematode community analyses.2. We compared effectiveness of qPCR-and HTS-based approaches with morphological nematode identification while examining how climate warming-induced plant range expansion may influence below-ground nematode assemblages. We extracted nematodes from soil of Centaurea stoebe and C. jacea populations in Slovenia, where both plant species are native, and Germany, where C. stoebe is a range expander and C. jacea is native. Half of each nematode sample was identified morphologically and the other half was analysed using targeted qPCR and a novel HTS approach.3. HTS produced the highest taxonomic resolution of the nematode community.Nematode taxa abundances correlated between the methods. Therefore, especially relative HTS and relative morphological data revealed nearly identical ecological patterns. All methods showed lower numbers of plant-feeding nematodes in rhizosphere soils of C. stoebe compared to C. jacea. However, a profound difference was observed between absolute and relative abundance data; both sampling origin and plant species affected relative abundances of bacterivorous nematodes, whereas there was no effect on absolute abundances.4. Taken together, as HTS correlates with relative analyses of soil nematode communities, while providing highest taxonomic resolution and sample throughput, we propose a combination of HTS with microscopic counting to supplement important quantitative data on soil nematode communities. This provides the most cost-effective, in-depth methodology to study soil nematode communityThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reduced tillage, but not organic matter input, increased nematode diversity and food web stability in European long‐term field experiments

“…One factor hampering the study of management effects across multiple study sites is that traditional microscopy is the most common method to study nematodes, which is time‐consuming, requires specialists and is expensive (Ritz, Black, Campbell, Harris, & Wood, ). Molecular methods to assess nematode absolute abundances (qPCR) and diversity (high‐throughput amplicon sequencing, DGGE, T‐RFLP) are faster, cheaper, and allow higher throughput than visual methods (Ahmed, Sapp, Prior, Karssen, & Back, ; Geisen et al, ). Amplicon sequencing may allow identification of taxa that cannot be distinguished morphologically.…”

Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity

“…These studies have yielded important insights on how our well-being is closely related to healthy soils with high biodiversity Orgiazzi et al, 2016). In addition, recent methodological advances such as high-throughput sequencing have enabled investigations of soil biodiversity with greater precision and have promoted insights on patterns of soil biodiversity at varying spatial scales (Bahram et al, 2018;Geisen et al, 2018;Ramirez et al, 2018;Potapov, Tiunov, & Scheu, 2019). Yet, only a few studies have tested contemporary biodiversity theories using patterns of soil biodiversity.…”

A review of soil nematodes as biological indicators for the assessment of soil health

“…Bacterivores were more abundant in nitrogen-enriched plots [42] . Geisen used morphological and molecular (qPCR and HTS) methods to analyze soil nematode communities and the results show that HTS afforded the highest taxonomic resolution and sample throughput [47] , although the various methods yielded similar outcomes.…”

“…When sample numbers are large, HTS is optimal. HTS does not require expertise in morphological identification, and is therefore more feasible for scientists with little knowledge of morphological identification [47] . Both the morphological and molecular methods can effectively identify and analyze nematode community structure, and this has a critical role in evaluating soil health using the soil nematode community structure.…”