2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61033-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Relational Databases with the Semantic Web: A Reflection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model is based on a materialization-based approach (forward chaining) [7]. In the materialization-base approach [28], the database D is the input, O is the target ontology and the mapping from D to O is M. The legacy data source is the ABox (A) and the ontology is the TBox (T). The SPARQL query Q is executed over the D, O, and M. Therefore, the access to the underlying data sources is abstracted independent of the mapping.…”
Section: Maritimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed model is based on a materialization-based approach (forward chaining) [7]. In the materialization-base approach [28], the database D is the input, O is the target ontology and the mapping from D to O is M. The legacy data source is the ABox (A) and the ontology is the TBox (T). The SPARQL query Q is executed over the D, O, and M. Therefore, the access to the underlying data sources is abstracted independent of the mapping.…”
Section: Maritimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, a use case for a hospital domain is performed. In the scope of the use case, the steps adhered are as follows: a hospital database is created, a hospital ontology is developed, a hospital policy ontology is created for the related hospital ontology, the relevant mappings between the policy ontology and the created database are established by utilizing the Ontop framework [28], and various queries are written using Ontop SPARQL. Ontop is an open-source platform to query databases through ontologies.…”
Section: Integrating Obac With Obda: a Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the basic elements of relational database, i.e., database schema R, constraints Σ over R, instance I of R, could be mapped into RDF graph and OWL by using direct mapping M. As we mentioned earlier, the M is defined based on the set of datalog predicates and rules, in which a lot of experience and effort from domain experts are required. We could say a direct mapping M is semantic preserving mapping [23], namely, there is no semantic inconsistency between RDB and OWL, if for every database schema R, set of constraints Σ (PKs and FKs), instance I of R, and semantics of the ontology Σ O , which satisfies:…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse mapping languages for transforming relational data into RDF have been introduced, reported in 2009 for the first time as a survey by W3C incubator group. Sequeda et al explain the limitations of semantic technologies in relational databases integration in [11]. During the recent years several extension to R2RML have been proposed in order to represent mapping rules such as RML [4] by Dimou et al or D2RML [2] by Chortaras et al The same applies for the implementation of tools to execute mapping rules in different languages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%