Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Volume 2 - EMNLP '09 2009
DOI: 10.3115/1699571.1699612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating sentence- and word-level error identification for disfluency correction

Abstract: While speaking spontaneously, speakers often make errors such as self-correction or false starts which interfere with the successful application of natural language processing techniques like summarization and machine translation to this data. There is active work on reconstructing this errorful data into a clean and fluent transcript by identifying and removing these simple errors. Previous research has approximated the potential benefit of conducting word-level reconstruction of simple errors only on those s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emphasis points of approaches removing disfluency are mostly repairs [8] while fillers received little attention. And approaches are most supervised methods which require annotated disfluencies [9], [10], [11], [12] and emphasis on the repairs. The previous approaches removing fillers are either rule-based methods which can remove all the fillers exhaustively or based on disfluency annotations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emphasis points of approaches removing disfluency are mostly repairs [8] while fillers received little attention. And approaches are most supervised methods which require annotated disfluencies [9], [10], [11], [12] and emphasis on the repairs. The previous approaches removing fillers are either rule-based methods which can remove all the fillers exhaustively or based on disfluency annotations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%