2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating support vector machine and genetic algorithm to implement dynamic wafer quality prediction system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] adopted a system using back propagation neural network for establishing a model for the etching process in semiconductor manufacturing. [7] compared the performance of the radial basis network and the back propagation neural network on the thin-film transistor liquid crystal display industry. The radial basis function network and the back propagation neural network produced quite similar results.…”
Section: Virtual Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14] adopted a system using back propagation neural network for establishing a model for the etching process in semiconductor manufacturing. [7] compared the performance of the radial basis network and the back propagation neural network on the thin-film transistor liquid crystal display industry. The radial basis function network and the back propagation neural network produced quite similar results.…”
Section: Virtual Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] reports that the support vector machines approach give a better prediction accuracy compared with the radial basis function network and also compared with the back-propagation approach, see also [1].…”
Section: Virtual Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the major issues related with neural networks for modeling of general non-linear dependencies, such as the choice of the network topology 2 , selection of the type of the activation functions, initialization of network parameters, as well as problems associated with extrapolation 3 and over fitting 4 , are inherited in the realm of neural networks based VM. The abovementioned drawbacks of linear regression models and neural networks motivated further research and recent introduction of GPR [15], SVR [17] and Kalman filter [27] based models into VM. GPR and SVR methods provide non-linear modeling frameworks with more 2 Number of nodes, their allocation into layers and connections between the nodes and layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of work in VM focuses on increasing prediction accuracy using socalled global models 1 , which can be classified either as linear models, such as multivariate linear regression (MLR) [12], and partial least squares (PLS) regression [13], or non-linear models, such as back propagation (feed-forward) neural networks (BPNN) [12], [14], radial basis neural networks (RBNN) [12], [14], Gaussian process regression (GPR) [12], [15], and support vector regression (SVR) [12], [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation