Integrating the online nursing evidence‐based information resources for evidence‐based nursing study in <scp>C</scp>hina

He, Mengxue; Hu, Yan

doi:10.1111/j.1440-172x.2012.02067.x

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With English being the international language of science [ 42 ], the majority of nursing research is published in English; however, less than 1 % of people in China are able to fluently understand it [ 43 ]. Translating evidence-based guidelines into Chinese could help overcome language obstacles to accessing research evidence in China [ 4 , 44 ]. In Canada, the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) has produced evidence-based guidelines for nursing care that are freely available on their website ( http://rnao.ca/bpg/language ), and a number are being translated into Chinese.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, gaps exist between recommendations for EBP and the actual care nurses provide in practice [ 2 , 3 ]. A range of barriers has been identified, however, and while factors that influence EBP have been extensively explored by researchers in many countries, this has predominantly taken place in Western cultures; little information exists about EBP in China [ 4 , 5 ]. As a relatively new concept, a recent scoping review ( n = 95 articles) found barriers not commonly documented in western countries [ 6 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

When east meets west: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice in Hunan China

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundResearch into evidence-based practice has been extensively explored in nursing and there is strong recognition that the organizational context influences implementation. A range of barriers has been identified; however, the research has predominantly taken place in Western cultures, and there is little information about factors that influence evidence-based practice in China. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice in Hunan province, a less developed region in China.MethodsA descriptive qualitative methodology was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff nurses, head nurses and directors (n = 13). Interviews were translated into English and verified for accuracy by two bilingual researchers. Both Chinese and English data were simultaneously analyzed for themes related to factors related to the evidence to be implemented (Innovation), nurses’ attitudes and beliefs (Potential Adopters), and the organizational setting (Practice Environment).ResultsBarriers included lack of available evidence in Chinese, nurses’ lack of understanding of what evidence-based practice means, and fear that patients will be angry about receiving care that is perceived as non-traditional. Nurses believed evidence-based practice was to be used when clinical problems arose, and not as a routine way to practice. Facilitators included leadership support and the pervasiveness of web based social network services such as Baidu (百度) for easy access to information.ConclusionWhile several parallels to previous research were found, our study adds to the knowledge base about factors related to evidence-based practice in different contextual settings. Findings are important for international comparisons to develop strategies for nurses to provide evidence-based care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12912-018-0295-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

When east meets west: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice in Hunan China

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sufficient resources must be provided to reviewers to learn methods of SRs/MAs as well as guidelines for reporting and quality assessment, and the collaboration with statisticians and librarians is also encouraged. Referring to the language problem, a website of integrated evidence‐based network information resources for EBHC studies was established by Fudan University (He & Hu, ). In 2015, the first Joanna Briggs Collaboration Centre for TCM EBHC was set up in Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals

Yang

Jiang

Wang

et al. 2016

Int J of Nursing Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the epidemiological characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the traditional Chinese medicine nursing field published in Chinese journals. The number of systematic reviews in the traditional Chinese medicine nursing field has increased, but their epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics have not been assessed completely. We generated an overview of reviews using a narrative approach. Four Chinese databases were searched for systematic reviews from inception to December 2015. The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklists were adopted to evaluate reporting and methodological quality, respectively. A total of 73 eligible systematic reviews, published from 2005 to 2015, were included. The deficiencies in reporting characteristics mainly lay in the lack of structured abstract or protocol, incomplete reporting of search strategies, study selection, and risk of bias. The deficiencies in methodological quality were reflected in the lack of a priori design and conflict of interest, incomplete literature searches, and assessment of publication bias. The quality of the evaluated reviews was unsatisfactory; attention should be paid to the improvement of reporting and methodological quality in the conduct of systematic reviews.

show abstract

“…The Journal also achieves its goal of internationality, although notably dominated by English‐speaking nations. This is not surprising given that English is considered the ‘language of health science’ (da Silva et al, ) and English as a second language is a recognized barrier in dissemination for international nursing scholars (He & Hu, ). The Journal also aims to inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership; explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership; assess the evidence for current practice; develop best practice in nursing management and leadership; examine the impact of policy developments; and address issues in governance.…”

Section: An Outline Of Patterns and Trends In Papers Published The Jomentioning

confidence: 99%

An overview of 5‐year patterns and trends in the Journal of Nursing Management

Timmins

2020

J Nurs Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Journal of Nursing Management (2019) is an international forum which aims to inform and advance the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis to provide evidence that may underpin and illuminate the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The Journal welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers and policymakers from a range of countries and backgrounds that examine relevant issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. An exploration of the recent output of scholars within the Journal of Nursing Management is insightful and provides a little more information on research activity in the field and the extent to which the overarching aims of the Journal are being achieved. The aim of this editorial is to provide a brief overview of general patterns and trends in publications in the Journal of Nursing Management with a focus on the past five years (2015-2019) and to suggest ways in which this information could be utilized to inform the future strategic direction of the journal and future publications.A search within the Scopus database (2019) revealed that there have been 2,266 publications in the Journal since its foundation in 1993. The majority of these papers are research articles (78.7%, n = 1,785). There are smaller numbers of literature reviews (7.9% n = 179) and editorials (7.5%, n = 170). The remainder of the papers consists of letters, commentaries and conference papers. The top ten countries publishing most frequently in the Journal (in descending order) were the USA, the UK, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Norway, Italy and Taiwan. Half of these are Englishspeaking countries. The most frequently published institutions were from mostly English-speaking countries:A 5-year analysis (Scopus, 2019) within the journal revealed that 562 papers have been published during this time, and the top-rank-

show abstract

Integrating the online nursing evidence‐based information resources for evidence‐based nursing study in China

Cited by 7 publications

References 24 publications

When east meets west: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice in Hunan China

When east meets west: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice in Hunan China

Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals

An overview of 5‐year patterns and trends in the Journal of Nursing Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About