Integrating the Streams of Morality Research

Graham, Jesse; Meindl, Peter; Beall, Erica

doi:10.1177/0963721412456842

Cited by 17 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These very basic findings (replicated with over 1,000 volunteers at YourMorals.org) lend support to Paul Bloom's (, ) argument that moral psychology has relied too much on dilemmas and situations involving strangers and has not paid enough attention to relatives and close others (with respect to whom our moral judgments likely evolved). While most of the scales, tasks, and hypothetical scenarios created to gauge our moral nature involve interactions between strangers involving harm (e.g., trolley dilemmas) or unfairness (e.g., the prisoner's dilemma and other economic games), our results show that when asked to reflect upon their own moral failings, people most often describe violations of honesty and loyalty to relatives and close others (see also Graham, Meindl, & Beall, ; Meindl & Graham, ). Given that people clearly consider honesty to be a very important moral trait (Aquino & Reed, ; Lapsley & Lasky, ; Smith, Türk‐Smith, & Christopher, ; Walker & Pitts, ) and most people lie multiple times every day (DePaulo, Kashy, Kirkendol, Wyer, & Epstein, ), it should probably come as no surprise that honesty hypocrisy is so prevalent.…”

Section: Current Work On Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisymentioning

confidence: 73%

When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy

Graham

Meindl

Koleva

et al. 2015

Social & Personality Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors review the various ways moral hypocrisy has been defined and operationalized by social psychologists, concentrating on three general types: moral duplicity, moral double standards, and moral weakness. While most approaches have treated moral hypocrisy as an interpersonal phenomenon, requiring public claims, preaching (versus practicing), or judgments of others (versus oneself), this paper also considers intrapersonal moral hypocrisy – that is, conflicts between values and behavior that may exist even in the absence of public pronouncements or judgments. Current attempts to understand and combat intrapersonal moral hypocrisy are aided by moral pluralism, the idea that there are many different moral values, which may come into conflict both between and within individuals. Examples are given to illustrate how taking into account individual differences in values can help to reduce moral hypocrisy. The authors close by considering the possibility that in a pluralistic world, reducing intrapersonal moral hypocrisy might not always be a normatively desired end goal.

show abstract

Section: Current Work On Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisymentioning

confidence: 73%

When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy

Graham

Meindl

Koleva

et al. 2015

Social & Personality Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As Narvaez (2010) asked, what is the relation between moral judgment on one hand, and actual moral behavior on the other? Following Graham, Meindl, and Beall (2012), how can the pluralism of moral judgments and concerns help researchers capture a wider array of morally relevant behaviors? Relatedly, what are the practical real-world implications of MFT for persuasion (e.g., Feinberg & Willer, 2013) or other aspects of moral disagreements?…”

Section: From Moral Judgment To Moral Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Moral Foundations Theory

Graham

Haidt

Koleva

et al. 2013

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Self Cite

1,351

781

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A su vez, en el campo de la psicología moral se ha observado un resurgimiento del interés por el estudio de la ideología durante la última década, entendiendo a esta última como un factor moderador entre diferencias individuales y efectos situacionales, a la vez que un poderoso predictor tanto de intereses como decisiones que las personas adoptan en el plano moral (Graham, Meindl y Beall 2012).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Ideología política en torno a «issue»s y valores sociales: un estudio correlacional en ciudadanos de Córdoba/Argentina

Brussino

Imhoff

Rabbia

et al. 2013

Am. Lat. Hoy. Rev. Cienc. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BIBLID [1130-2887 (2013) 65, 161-182] Fecha de recepción: 8 de agosto del 2012 Fecha de aceptación: 6 de septiembre del 2013 RESUMEN: El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la relación existente entre los valores sociales y la ideología política de los ciudadanos cordobeses. Para ello, se tomó una muestra cuotificada por nivel socioeconómico, edad y sexo de 373 ciudadanos de Córdoba entre 18 a 65 años de edad. A los participantes seleccionados se les aplicó a) la escala de ideología política que considera posicionamientos situacionales sobre los siguientes tópicos específicos: política social, economía, sexualidad, drogas, religión, ecología, seguridad, comunicación (Brussino, Imhoff, Rabbia y Paz García); y b) el cuestionario de los valores básicos, propuesto por Gouveia et al. (2008), que está compuesto por 18 valores agrupados en seis orientaciones generales. Los datos obtenidos fueron sometidos a un análisis correlacional indicando que los distintos posicionamientos ideológicos analizados se relacionan diferencialmente con los valores sociales de los ciudadanos de Córdoba. En la misma línea, se efectuaron análisis de regresión múltiple a través del © Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca IDEOLOGÍA POLÍTICA EN TORNO A ISSUES Y VALORES SOCIALES: UN ESTUDIO CORRELACIONAL EN CIUDADANOS DE CÓRDOBA/ARGENTINA 162 © Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca América Latina Hoy, 65, 2013, pp. 161-182método de pasos sucesivos, mediante el cual se constató la contribución específica que realizan los valores sociales a la explicación de los distintos posicionamientos ideológicos.Palabras clave: ideología política, conservadurismo, progresismo, valores sociales, cultura política.ABSTRACT: The main purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between social values and political ideology among Córdoba's citizens. In order to achieve that goal, a quoted sample for socioeconomic level, age and sex of 373 18 to 65 year old citizens of Córdoba was taken. The following instruments were applied to the selected participants: a) the Political Ideology Scale which considers situational positioning on the following specific topics: social politics, economics, sexuality, drugs, religion, ecology, safety, communication (Brussino, Imhoff, Rabbia and Paz García); and b) the Basic Values Questionnaire of Gouveia et al. (2008), which is composed by 18 values grouped in six general orientations. The obtained information was submitted to a correlational indicate that different ideological positions relate differentially analyzed with the social values of the citizens of Córdoba. In addition, multiple regression analysis performed by the method of successive steps was carried out. Results show the specific contribution made by social values to the explanation of the different ideological positions.

show abstract

Integrating the Streams of Morality Research

Cited by 17 publications

References 30 publications

When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy

When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy

Moral Foundations Theory

Ideología política en torno a «issue»s y valores sociales: un estudio correlacional en ciudadanos de Córdoba/Argentina

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About