2022
DOI: 10.1177/14759217211073505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating visual sensing and structural identification using 3D-digital image correlation and topology optimization to detect and reconstruct the 3D geometry of structural damage

Abstract: This paper describes a novel technique for detecting internal or unseen damage in structural steel members by combining measurements from full-field three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) with a topology optimization framework. Unlike the majority of conventional methods that rely on specialized forms of surface-penetrating waves or radiation imaging, this work employs optical cameras to measure surface strains and deformations using the 3D-DIC technique followed by an optimization approach to de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain tensors acquired from the DIC measurements are susceptible to noise originating from lighting fluctuations, glare, irregularities, poor‐quality speckle patterns, sensor noise, and quantization. [ 33–35 ] This noise can be observed in the strain maps presented in the first row of Figure 2, which depict exclusively the noise distribution when the corresponding external load is zero. As several factors (as mentioned earlier) cause noise in DIC measurements, noise elimination remains challenging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The strain tensors acquired from the DIC measurements are susceptible to noise originating from lighting fluctuations, glare, irregularities, poor‐quality speckle patterns, sensor noise, and quantization. [ 33–35 ] This noise can be observed in the strain maps presented in the first row of Figure 2, which depict exclusively the noise distribution when the corresponding external load is zero. As several factors (as mentioned earlier) cause noise in DIC measurements, noise elimination remains challenging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As several factors (as mentioned earlier) cause noise in DIC measurements, noise elimination remains challenging. [ 35 ] However, we are more interested in deriving the strain tensors than capturing the strain tensor images because acquiring a minimum amount of true strain data that responds to the underlying subsurface defects can significantly assist the OD algorithms in identifying and characterizing invisible subsurface defects of various shapes and depths at varying load limits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DIC has a better performance compared to Linear Variable Differential Transformer (LVDT) sensors and strain gauges that can extract only values at a single point. The DIC method has gained significant popularity in recent years, and various studies have been performed using this technique, [32][33][34][35][36][37] as it can update the FEM in a more efficient way. The DIC method obtains the amount of displacement and strain of the desired surface by comparing the images taken from the specimen, before and after the deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%