2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Wikipedia editing into health professions education: a curricular inventory and review of the literature

Abstract: Introduction Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia read by millions seeking medical information. To provide health professions students with skills to critically assess, edit, and improve Wikipedia’s medical content, a skillset aligned with evidence-based medicine (EBM), Wikipedia courses have been integrated into health professions schools’ curriculum. This literature review and curricular inventory of Wikipedia educational initiatives provides an overview of current approaches and identifies directions for fut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 More recently, an inventory of Wikipedia courses aimed at health professions students identified 27 curricular offerings, ranging from course assignments to complete courses on Wikipedia editing. 16 However, tensions still exist over Wikipedia as a trustworthy information source and whether the academic community should promote its use in their classrooms, with some students and instructors relegated to using Wikipedia as a "guilty secret. " 17 Indeed, the use of Wikipedia as a classroom tool has evoked negative reactions, particularly within institutions of higher education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 More recently, an inventory of Wikipedia courses aimed at health professions students identified 27 curricular offerings, ranging from course assignments to complete courses on Wikipedia editing. 16 However, tensions still exist over Wikipedia as a trustworthy information source and whether the academic community should promote its use in their classrooms, with some students and instructors relegated to using Wikipedia as a "guilty secret. " 17 Indeed, the use of Wikipedia as a classroom tool has evoked negative reactions, particularly within institutions of higher education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching students to contribute to Wikipedia provides excellent opportunities for students to develop evidence-based medicine skills [ 24 26 ]. Notably, there are a myriad of ways to deliver these courses to the audience, including live sessions, videos, and online interactive platforms, any/all of which can be delivered both in person and remotely [ 25 ]. The target audience varies from 1st-year students to professionals, and different faculty adapt the methodology to their local institutional environment, as shown in Table 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study recruited 17 instructors in a purposive sampling that drew on an inventory of existing HPE courses that substantively integrated Wikipedia into their teaching approach. 22 PCM initiated the first round of recruitment to potential participants and scheduled interviews with consenting instructors via email. After the first wave of interviews, the research team convened to review the range of recruited participants and the corresponding data collected to maximize the range of institutional roles and disciplines of HPE instructors recruited in the second wave of emails.…”
Section: Context and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 A recent inventory of Wikipedia courses aimed at health professions students identified 30 curricular offerings ranging from course assignments to complete courses. 10 The first reported use of Wikipedia in 2012 was a neuroscience course in which students edited Wikipedia as a course assignment. 11 Later, Azzam et al 13 described the first for-credit medical course fully dedicated to editing and writing medical articles on Wikipedia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%