2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-010-9424-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Wraparound into a Schoolwide System of Positive Behavior Supports

Abstract: We describe the structure for implementation of the wraparound process within a multi-tiered system of school wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) to address the needs of the 1-5% of students with complex emotional/ behavioral challenges. The installation of prerequisite system features that, based on a 3 year demonstration process, we consider critical to full operation of the Tier 3 wraparound intervention within a system of SWPBS is also described. We include examples of system implementation benchmarks t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in the third level of support, intensive interventions, students who are not responding to the other two levels of interventions and thus are in need of individually designed supports are provided intensive individualized supports. Examples of intensive individualized supports include individual behavior support plans and wrap-around services (Eber, Hyde, & Suter, 2011;Newcomer & Lewis, 2004;Scott & Caron, 2005). Due to the substantial time required by these interventions, schools strive for full implementation of universal and targeted supports first so that less than 5% of the population need the intensive services.…”
Section: Swpbs Leadership Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the third level of support, intensive interventions, students who are not responding to the other two levels of interventions and thus are in need of individually designed supports are provided intensive individualized supports. Examples of intensive individualized supports include individual behavior support plans and wrap-around services (Eber, Hyde, & Suter, 2011;Newcomer & Lewis, 2004;Scott & Caron, 2005). Due to the substantial time required by these interventions, schools strive for full implementation of universal and targeted supports first so that less than 5% of the population need the intensive services.…”
Section: Swpbs Leadership Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, given that academic problems are likely to co-occur with both physical and mental health difficulties (McLeod, Uemura, & Rohrman, 2012), collaborative care in schools will need to attend to the additional dimension of educational health (e.g., academic engagement and performance) in order to be effective and contextually relevant. The SMART Center is therefore committed to advancing models that support the development, evaluation, and scale-up service integration models across the fragmented domains of physical, mental, and educational health, and adapting existing collaborative care models where necessary to meet the needs of youth, families, providers, and school systems (Eber, Hyde, & Suter, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is an extensive literature supporting the common Tier 3 strategy of using functional behavior assessment to inform the development of an individualized behavior intervention plan for students with serious emotional and behavioral disorders that impede their functioning in school and can disrupt the learning of other students. Finally, for youth with the most complex needs, there is an emerging literature demonstrating the potential for positive impacts of structured “Tier 3 wraparound” teams that coordinate care to address a child's needs across different areas of functioning and settings (Eber, Hyde, & Suter, 2011; Malloy, Drake, Abate, & Cormier, 2010). …”
Section: Effectiveness Of School Mental Health Programming Across Mulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area of progress related to comprehensive intervention is wraparound-an approach to intensive intervention that has been incorporated into multitiered systems of support for students with severe emotional and behavioral support needs (Eber, Hyde, & Suter, 2011). Wraparound, which first emerged from systems-of-care models in mental health, is a planning process in which teachers, family members, and community representatives come together as a team to develop, implement, and evaluate individualized support plans that build on a student's strengths to address their needs.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%