2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1204.5979
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration in algebraically closed valued fields with sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From here on, our discussion will be of an increasingly formal nature. Many statements are exact copies of those in [19,20,22] and often the same proofs work, provided that the auxiliary results are replaced by the corresponding ones obtained above. For the reader's convenience, we will write down all the details.…”
Section: Generalized Euler Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From here on, our discussion will be of an increasingly formal nature. Many statements are exact copies of those in [19,20,22] and often the same proofs work, provided that the auxiliary results are replaced by the corresponding ones obtained above. For the reader's convenience, we will write down all the details.…”
Section: Generalized Euler Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Convention 5.1. We reiterate [22,Convention 2.32] here, with a different terminology, since this trivial-looking convention is actually quite crucial for understanding the discussion below, especially the parts that involve special bijections. For any set A, let c(A) = {(a, rv(a), t) : (a, t) ∈ A and a ∈ pr VF (A)}.…”
Section: Generalized Euler Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We introduce a syntactical complexity function µ, assigning a natural number to each quantifier-free formula (or a term) that indicates the highest nesting level of the function symbols exp, log : K −→ K, for instance, µ(exp(exp(X) log(X))) = 2; for this purpose there is no need to distinguish between exp and log. This is a standard syntactical device and we omit its definition here, see [9,Definition 2.16] for an analogue.…”
Section: Quantifier Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a reduced cross-section. We can add a reduced cross-section csn : Γ −→ RV to the language L RV , denote by L † RV the extension, and consider the corresponding integration theory; this has been worked out in [33]. We shall, however, only need a few facts about definable sets in RV in this setting.…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%