Integration Integration of AHP and TOPSIS Methods for Small and Medium Industries Development Decision Making

Abstract

Financial problems are one of the reasons why small and medium-sized industries (SMIs) in West Kutai have not developed optimally. Government assistance programs are one of the solutions. This program must be appropriate, so a decision-making tool is needed to help choose the right SMIs to be assisted later. The weight of the criteria was determined using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique, and the priority of the SMIs as the preferred proposal for the recipients of development assistance was determined using the Technique for Other Reference by Similarly to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. Labor, investment, production capacity, production value, and raw materials were used to determine the priorities of SMIs beneficiaries. Furthermore, TOPSIS prioritizes the development of alternative small and medium-sized industries with types of handicraft commodities. Integration of AHP and TOPSIS methods has been successfully used in the IKM Development Priority Determination Application, with 83.3% precision and 96.4% accuracy achieved by using a confusion matrix so that the IKM ranking can be known. The results of the study found that integration of the two methods was successfully used for Small and Medium Industries Development Decision Making.

Analisis Variasi Implementasi Algoritma Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Kalibrasi

“…Penelitian itu diantaranya jurnal "Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada Rumah Makan Ciganea Pusat" karya Bintang Rama Putra dan Anita Diana untuk memilih karyawan terbaik di sebuah rumah makan dengan melakukan penilaian secara objektif [6], jurnal "Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Dosen Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pada STMIK Primakara" karya I Wayan Sutrisna Yasa, Komang Tri Werthi, dan I Putu Satwika, untuk menentukan dosen terbaik dan melakukan perhitungan nilai rasio konsistensi dengan nilai indeks random dari beberapa peneliti [7], dan jurnal karya Retno Waluyo, Ito Setiawan, dan Vina Wulandari yang berjudul "Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Borda Untuk Seleksi Penerima Pembebasan Operasional Sekolah" yang menjelaskan penggunaan metode AHP pada sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan dan merangking siswa yang menerima beasiswa pembebasan operasional sekolah [8]. Berdasarkan beberapa penelitian terdahulu yang telah disebutkan, metode AHP sebagai metode pendukung keputusan menjadi solusi yang tepat untuk mengatasi permasalahan penyeleksian dan perangkingan untuk mendapatkan alternatif terbaik dari menggunakan penilaian yang objektif sehingga menghasilkan hasil yang akurat [9]. Namun pada penerapan metode AHP ada beberapa variasi cara implementasinya dengan menggunakan teori dasar Thomas L. Saaty.…”

Sensitivity Analysis of Various AHP Process: A Case Study on Consumption Fish Farming

“…Based on several previous studies that above-mentioned, the AHP method as a decision support method is the right solution to overcome selection and ranking problems to get the best alternative using objective assessments to produce accurate results [9]. However, when applying the AHP method, there are several variations in how to implement it using the basic theory of Thomas L. Saaty.…”