Integration modes, global networks, and knowledge diffusion in overseas M&As by emerging market firms

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine how integration modes impact the acquirer knowledge diffusion capacity of overseas mergers and acquisitions (M&As) effected by emerging market firms and the role played by the global innovation network position of the acquiring firms in affecting this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Through the use of structural equation modelling and bootstrap testing, the hypotheses are tested by drawing upon a sample of 102 overseas M&As effected by listed Chinese manufacturing companies. Findings The results show that acquirers from emerging countries are unable to increase the knowledge diffusion capacity unless they choose the right post-merger integration mode. This paper also finds that the relationship between integration mode and knowledge diffusion is channelled through the centrality and structural holes of acquirers in the global innovation networks. When considering the combinations of different resource similarities and complementarities of the acquired firms, differences emerge in the integration model and network embedded path of acquirers in emerging countries. Practical implications Emerging market multinational enterprises should consider post-merger integration as a crucial facilitator to the crafting of global innovation network positions that promote knowledge diffusion. The choices of integration mode and brand management autonomy should be matched with the resource similarities and complementarities that exist between the acquirer and target firms. Originality/value Based on the resource orchestration theory and by focussing on network centrality and structural hole as the crucial links, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the relationship between post-merger integration and knowledge diffusion and sheds light on latecomer firms from emerging countries.

Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system

“…However, Phelps et al (2012) pointed out in their survey that only 35% of network studies used panel data, that only half of those utilized panel regression estimations and that almost all interpersonal network research used cross-sectional variation. Such cross-sectional studies also include recent studies, such as those by Guan et al (2017) and Li et al (2019). Many studies using longitudinal data applied random effects in panel regression models (Ferriani et al, 2009;Guan et al, 2015Guan and Liu, 2016), and a few used fixed-effects models (Yan and Guan, 2018).…”

Competitive Advantages of Cross-Border M&As to Non-Location-Bound Chinese ICT Firms

“…We collected M&A data and financial data from two datasets, one of which was derived from the BVD (Zephyr) database, which is a well-known international M&As database and widely used in cross-border M&A research [49,50]. However, distorted data points remained.…”

The micro-foundations of strategic ambidexterity: Chinese cross-border M&As, Mid-View thinking and integration management

“…The top management teams of the acquired firm can use their expertise and experience to exploit the existing knowledge bases, while the exploration of the new knowledge of the combined entity can be fostered under conditions of freedom and high autonomy. This research provides a nuanced understanding of how integration modes may impact the acquirer's knowledge diffusion capacity in Chinese cross-border M&As (Li, Chen, & Liu, 2019).…”

“…Thus, comparative studies on M&A integration, microfoundations, and strategic ambidexterity in the context of emerging and developed markets are a promising future direction. Furthermore, as acquired targets become subsidiaries of global MNE networks, multiple embeddedness (Meyer, Li, & Schotter, 2020), adaptive learning (Luo, 2020), and global innovation networks (Li et al, 2019) may offer useful theoretical lenses to further advance the research agenda of the global strategies adopted by EMNEs.…”