2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:auro.0000016864.12513.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of a Rehabilitation Robotic System (KARES II) with Human-Friendly Man-Machine Interaction Units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'Care-O-Bot' assistive robot has been through many iterations [16], [17], but has not emphasized self-care tasks. [18] reports that the KARES II system used multiple forms of user input and provided assistance with shaving, but the details of how people used the system to shave are unclear.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'Care-O-Bot' assistive robot has been through many iterations [16], [17], but has not emphasized self-care tasks. [18] reports that the KARES II system used multiple forms of user input and provided assistance with shaving, but the details of how people used the system to shave are unclear.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, there has been done much research [19], [20] in how to improve the functionality of rehabilitation robots. The improvement of the functionality is reached by: 1. advanced user-interfacing and 2. innovative robot capabilities.…”
Section: Freek Liefhebber Joris Sijsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wheelchair-mounted robot (developed in the KARES project) is intended to assist the user in handling various objects, opening doors, etc., while they are in the wheelchair. A detailed description of the design and functionality of the robots for object handling can be found in some of our previous papers (Song et al, 1999;Bien et al, 2004). The robots for manipulation assistance may be excluded from the smart house structure when the user has reasonable motion, adequate muscle strength in the upper limbs, and adequate hand dexterity.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the wheelchair projects highlight automatic wheelchair control and functionality, such as obstacle avoidance and path planning, to achieve complex maneuvers (Levine et al, 1999;Bourhis et al, 2001;Pries et al, 1998;Prassler et al, 2001;Simpson et al, 2004;Hamagami and Hirata, 2004). Others prioritize innovative human-machine interfaces (Yanco, 1998;Mazo, 2001;Pries et al, 1998;Bien et al, 2004;Moon et al, 2003). Our intelligent wheelchair design focused on effective obstacle avoidance in autonomous navigation using a tilted scanning mechanism of Laser Range Finder (LRF).…”
Section: Intelligent Wheelchairmentioning
confidence: 99%