Integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps: a mixed-method study on teacher learning

Abstract

BackgroundThe explication of relations between clinical and basic sciences can help vertical integration in medical curricula. Concept mapping might be a useful technique for this explication. Little is known about teachers’ ability regarding the articulation of integration. We examined therefore which factors affect the learning of groups of clinicians and basic scientists on different expertise levels who learn to articulate the integration of clinical and basic sciences in concept maps.MethodsAfter a pilot for fine-tuning group size and instructions, seven groups of expert clinicians and basic scientists and seven groups of residents with a similar disciplinary composition constructed concept maps about a clinical problem that fit their specializations. Draft and final concepts maps were compared on elaborateness and articulated integration by means of t-tests. Participants completed a questionnaire on motivation and their evaluation of the instructions. ANOVA’s were run to compare experts’ and residents’ views. Data from video tapes and notes were qualitatively analyzed. Finally, the three data sources were interpreted in coherence by using Pearson’s correlations and qualitative interpretation.ResultsResidents outshone experts as regards learning to articulate integration as comparison of the draft and final versions showed. Experts were more motivated and positive about the concept mapping procedure and instructions, but this did not correlate with the extent of integration fond in the concept maps. The groups differed as to communication: residents interacted from the start (asking each other for clarification), whereas overall experts only started interaction when they had to make joint decisions.ConclusionsOur results suggest that articulation of integration can be learned, but this learning is not related to participants’ motivation or their views on the instructions. Decision making and interaction, however, do relate to the articulation of integration and this suggests that teacher learning programs for designing integrated educational programmes should incorporate co-construction tasks. Expertise level turned out to be decisive for both the level of articulation of integration, the ability to improve the articulated integration and the cooperation pattern.

Impact of instructor-provided notes on the learning and exam performance of medical students in an organ system-based medical curriculum

“…Furthermore, the field of medical sciences has been expanding over time, and hard work is required for planning, organization and execution of new teaching methods. 15 – 17 …”

A Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients: Design-Based Research Study

“…Concept mapping is an approach applied in medical education in general [ 16 ] and in clinical reasoning training and assessment [ 17 , 18 ]. In the grounded theory study, which was the basis for the development of the tool, concept mapping was identified as a suitable method of teaching and assessing clinical reasoning skills [ 10 ], as it reflects the nonlinear aspects of the process.…”

Using Concept Maps to Create Meaningful Learning in Medical Education

“…Research by Vink et al (2015) documented that concept mapping facilitated the integration of basic and clinical sciences concepts in the co-construction of concept maps relevant to medical students. A group of expert physicians, in basic and clinical science, and a group of residents developed a series of concept maps that included all the relevant concepts and relationships needed by medical students to understand eight different clinical problems.…”