2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Computational Docking into Anti-Cancer Drug Response Prediction Models

Oleksandr Narykov,
Yitan Zhu,
Thomas Brettin
et al.

Abstract: Cancer is a heterogeneous disease in that tumors of the same histology type can respond differently to a treatment. Anti-cancer drug response prediction is of paramount importance for both drug development and patient treatment design. Although various computational methods and data have been used to develop drug response prediction models, it remains a challenging problem due to the complexities of cancer mechanisms and cancer-drug interactions. To better characterize the interaction between cancer and drugs,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After completing these tasks, Spruce created a docking-ready receptor. The generated grid box upon the active site had a dimension of 37.884282, − 3.588333, and 20.849103 in XYZ dimensions from the obtained design units for the target UDP_GlcNAc-MurG complex 63 . Following this prerequisite step, validation of docking method was performed by redocking of co-crystalized substrate, UDP_GlcNAc and found to have an RMSD value lower than 2 Å.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After completing these tasks, Spruce created a docking-ready receptor. The generated grid box upon the active site had a dimension of 37.884282, − 3.588333, and 20.849103 in XYZ dimensions from the obtained design units for the target UDP_GlcNAc-MurG complex 63 . Following this prerequisite step, validation of docking method was performed by redocking of co-crystalized substrate, UDP_GlcNAc and found to have an RMSD value lower than 2 Å.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of conventional machine learning algorithms employed for anti-cancer drug response prediction include linear regression [8], support vector machine (SVM) [9,10], random forests (RF) [3,11,12], and boosting-based methods [13,14]. MOLI [15], DrugOrchestra [16], PathDSP [17], and several other models [18] use fully connected neural networks to predict drug responses of cancer cell lines represented by their genomic signatures. GraphDRP [19], tCNNs [20], and DeepCDR [21] are representative drug response prediction models utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNN) in their model architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%