Integration of ecological–biological thresholds in conservation decision making

Abstract

In the Anthropocene, coupled human and natural systems dominate and only a few natural systems remain relatively unaffected by human influence. On the one hand, conservation criteria based on areas of minimal human impact are not relevant to much of the biosphere. On the other hand, conservation criteria based on economic factors are problematic with respect to their ability to arrive at operational indicators of well-being that can be applied in practice over multiple generations. Coupled human and natural systems are subject to economic development which, under current management structures, tends to affect natural systems and cross planetary boundaries. Hence, designing and applying conservation criteria applicable in real-world systems where human and natural systems need to interact and sustainably coexist is essential. By recognizing the criticality of satisfying basic needs as well as the great uncertainty over the needs and preferences of future generations, we sought to incorporate conservation criteria based on minimal human impact into economic evaluation. These criteria require the conservation of environmental conditions such that the opportunity for intergenerational welfare optimization is maintained. Toward this end, we propose the integration of ecological-biological thresholds into decision making and use as an example the planetary-boundaries approach. Both conservation scientists and economists must be involved in defining operational ecological-biological thresholds that can be incorporated into economic thinking and reflect the objectives of conservation, sustainability, and intergenerational welfare optimization.

Hidden collapse is driven by fire and logging in a socioecological forest ecosystem

“…That said, remotely sensed products are rapidly evolving, and new technologies such as Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) offer potential to resolve this problem (58). A lack of long-term monitoring data to forecast ecosystem collapse has been identified as a key shortcoming that limits not only the understanding of ecosystems (59) but also the identification of strategies to manage natural capital that are critical to both ecosystem and industry function (60). Moreover, given that what constitutes ecosystem collapse is ecosystem specific, a sound conceptual understanding of an ecosystem is needed to identify robust state variables that can be used to predict collapse, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring of ecological, social, and economic variables.…”

Using Pointing Dogs and Hierarchical Models to Evaluate American Woodcock Winter Occupancy and Densities

“…4). The information provided from occupancy modeling related to canopy cover covariates may be of greater use to land managers who need to make discrete, yes-or-no decisions when setting specific habitat-related goals (Mavrommati et al 2016). For questions related to habitat abundance and habitat connectivity, the coarse but precise estimates from the occupancy modeling may be especially useful.…”

Matching scope, purpose and uses of planetary boundaries science

“…Overall, most commentaries bring forward human dimensions that are only hinted at in applications of the concept. These dimensions underlies topics of fairness, subjective value, and ethics (Neuvonen et al 2014, Sandin et al 2015, Saunders 2015, Mavrommati et al 2016. These dimensions are dynamic and evolving and complement biological and political human facets.…”