2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1158881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of geometric variation and part deformation into variation propagation of 3-D assemblies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the repeated experiments, the bolt jointed structures were disassembled and reassembled three times. In this way, the wave propagation path might be changed due to assembly variations [ 36 ]. The other main source of deviation is that there is a scatter in the torque-preload relationship [ 1 ], and the preloads were not the same when the bolt torques were the same in the repeated experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the repeated experiments, the bolt jointed structures were disassembled and reassembled three times. In this way, the wave propagation path might be changed due to assembly variations [ 36 ]. The other main source of deviation is that there is a scatter in the torque-preload relationship [ 1 ], and the preloads were not the same when the bolt torques were the same in the repeated experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random errors (roughness and waviness) are similar to geographic terrains and the average roughness has no practical meaning in relating surfaces to its functional effectiveness [31]. Further, the surface waviness under a large applied force (such as clamping and cutting forces) has a negligible contribution to the resulting surface variation at a distance greater than 20 mm away from the source, in accordance to Saint-Venant's Principle [32]. Hence, a manufacturing simulation during the prediction stage can focus only on systematic errors when assembling fixture and part models, without significantly influencing the setup accuracy.…”
Section: Machine Tool Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing assembly error evaluation methods mainly include the tolerance analysis method [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ] and finite element analysis [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. In precision assembly, surface topography errors in the parts are unavoidable and cause assembly error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%