2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/145243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of High-Volume Molecular and Imaging Data for Composite Biomarker Discovery in the Study of Melanoma

Abstract: In this work the effects of simple imputations are studied, regarding the integration of multimodal data originating from different patients. Two separate datasets of cutaneous melanoma are used, an image analysis (dermoscopy) dataset together with a transcriptomic one, specifically DNA microarrays. Each modality is related to a different set of patients, and four imputation methods are employed to the formation of a unified, integrative dataset. The application of backward selection together with ensemble cla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two approaches including a combination of data (COD) and the combination of interpretations (COI) were exploited for feature integration. COD is applied before classification, and it aggregates features from each source for producing a single feature vector, but in COI, 9 independent classifications are done based on the individual feature subsets using a proper voting mechanism [34], and involve aggregating outputs, so it uses algebraic combiners for decision-making strategy. In another study that was done in related to prostate cancer has been told that COD methods are more optimal [35].…”
Section: Multimodal Data Fusion Of Separate Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches including a combination of data (COD) and the combination of interpretations (COI) were exploited for feature integration. COD is applied before classification, and it aggregates features from each source for producing a single feature vector, but in COI, 9 independent classifications are done based on the individual feature subsets using a proper voting mechanism [34], and involve aggregating outputs, so it uses algebraic combiners for decision-making strategy. In another study that was done in related to prostate cancer has been told that COD methods are more optimal [35].…”
Section: Multimodal Data Fusion Of Separate Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches including a combination of data (COD) and the combination of interpretations (COI) were exploited for feature integration. COD is applied before classification, and it aggregates features from each source for producing a single feature vector, but in COI, independent classifications are done based on the individual feature subsets using a proper voting mechanism [34], and involve aggregating outputs, so it uses algebraic combiners for decision-making strategy. In another study that was done in related to prostate cancer has been told that COD methods are more optimal [35].…”
Section: Multimodal Data Fusion Of Separate Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcriptomic analyses among different groups allow the exploration and identification of alterations in gene expression profiles between them. The data used in this section were previously analyzed in [16]. Briefly, the microarray dataset was taken from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [17], with accession number GDS1375.…”
Section: Analysis Of Transcriptomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transcriptomic analysis from [16] revealed 1425 unique differentially expressed genes. Enrichment analysis showed 36 statistically significant biological processes (p-value < 0.05), which are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Transcriptomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%