2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9386-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Imaging Signs into RadLex

Abstract: Imaging signs form an important part of the language of radiology, but are not represented in established lexicons. We sought to incorporate imaging signs into RSNA's RadLex® ontology of radiology terms. Names of imaging signs and their definitions were culled from books, journal articles, dictionaries, and biomedical web sites. Imaging signs were added into RadLex as subclasses of the term "imaging sign," which was defined in RadLex as a subclass of "imaging observation." A total of 743 unique imaging signs w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maintain their utility as "best practices" for the radiology community, both RadLex® and RSNA reporting templates should continue to grow (Shore, Rubin, and Kahn, 2012). The use of standardized biomedical terminologies in reporting templates can reduce communication errors.The unmatched terms (the terms occurring in the free-text reports but not in the templates) from the reporting templates provide a "bottom-up" inventory of entities used in radiology reports, which most frequently occurred ones might be served as candidate terms for inclusion in the templates and therefore enhancestandardized terminology coverage of the templates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain their utility as "best practices" for the radiology community, both RadLex® and RSNA reporting templates should continue to grow (Shore, Rubin, and Kahn, 2012). The use of standardized biomedical terminologies in reporting templates can reduce communication errors.The unmatched terms (the terms occurring in the free-text reports but not in the templates) from the reporting templates provide a "bottom-up" inventory of entities used in radiology reports, which most frequently occurred ones might be served as candidate terms for inclusion in the templates and therefore enhancestandardized terminology coverage of the templates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) (20), which have boosted the standard imaging feature-set construction. Furthermore, RadLex, a new radiology lexicon resource with more than 40 000 standardized terms covering all aspects of radiology, has significantly advanced communication in radiology (21)(22)(23). In addition, other studies have also made recommendations for reducing imaging feature redundancy (13,17).…”
Section: Categories Of Extraction Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RadLex is an ontology of radiology terms developed and published by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) [6][7][8]. It was developed to address gaps in general clinical vocabularies [9], and incorporates terms for anatomy, diseases, and imaging signs [10]. RadLex has been used to index radiological literature, learning materials, and radiological procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%