2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.93.124059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of inhomogeneous cosmological spacetimes in the BSSN formalism

Abstract: We present cosmological-scale numerical simulations of an evolving universe in full general relativity (GR) and introduce a new numerical tool, CosmoGRaPH, which employs the BaumgarteShapiro-Shibata-Nakamura (BSSN) formalism on a 3-dimensional grid. Using CosmoGRaPH, we calculate the effect of an inhomogeneous matter distribution on the evolution of a spacetime. We also present the results of a set of standard stability tests to demonstrate the robustness of our simulations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for our chosen threshold value for , the O(10 −5 ) error in the numerical solution for Ψ shown in Fig. 4 (middle panel) is comparable to the level of Hamiltonian constraint violations typically found in other numerical relativity codes [26,37].…”
Section: Point-like Sinusoidal and Spherically Symmetric Sourcessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For example, for our chosen threshold value for , the O(10 −5 ) error in the numerical solution for Ψ shown in Fig. 4 (middle panel) is comparable to the level of Hamiltonian constraint violations typically found in other numerical relativity codes [26,37].…”
Section: Point-like Sinusoidal and Spherically Symmetric Sourcessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…On the other hand, we may also parametrize the null geodesics by the endpoints δx E and δx O , or -more precisely -by their equivalence classes in Q O and Q E respectively. In the second parametrization, we need to impose the linear condition given by the time lapse formula (50). The resulting dimension of the null geodesic family is therefore again 3 + 3 − 1 = 5.…”
Section: Direction Variation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Giblin et al (2016a,b) and Mertens et al (2016) has been mentioned above in Sect. 12; a similar approach was adopted by Bentivegna & Bruni (2016).…”
Section: More-detailed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 88%