Integration of Intention and Outcome for Moral Judgment in Frontotemporal Dementia: Brain Structural Signatures

Abstract

Background: Moral judgment has been proposed to rely on a distributed brain network. This function is impaired in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), a condition involving damage to some regions of this network. However, no studies have investigated moral judgment in bvFTD via structural neuroimaging. Methods: We compared the performance of 21 bvFTD patients and 19 controls on a moral judgment task involving scenarios that discriminate between the contributions of intentions and outcomes. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess (a) the atrophy pattern in bvFTD patients, (b) associations between gray matter (GM) volume and moral judgments, and (c) structural differences between bvFTD subgroups (patients with relatively preserved moral judgment and patients with severer moral judgment impairments). Results: Patients judged attempted harm as more permissible and accidental harm as less permissible than controls. The groups' performance on accidental harm was associated with GM volume in the precuneus. In controls, it was al- so associated with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC). Also, both groups' performance on attempted harm was associated with GM volume in the temporoparietal junction. Patients exhibiting worse performance displayed smaller GM volumes in the precuneus and temporal pole. Conclusions: Results suggest that moral judgment abnormalities in bvFTD are associated with impaired integration of intentions and outcomes, which depends on an extended brain network. In bvFTD, moral judgment seems to critically depend on areas beyond the VMPFC.

Men, women…who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition

“…More specifically, perceiving an individual who intentionally hurts another person triggers an early boost in the amygdala [19], which plays a critical role in evaluating actual or potential threats [89–91]. In addition, witnessing a violent conflict of two individuals engaged in an aggressive interaction involves the activation of a set of regions associated with body and emotion perception, as well as social interaction [92], which includes the premotor cortex, the extra-striate body area, the fusiform gyrus, the insula, and the amygdala.…”

Tackling variability: A multicenter study to provide a gold‐standard network approach for frontotemporal dementia

“…A voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) analysis with the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12) was performed to establish the global atrophy pattern in patients with neurodegeneration. As in previous research of our group (Baez et al, ; Couto et al, ; Santamaria‐Garcia et al, ), data were preprocessed on the DARTEL Toolbox following validated procedures (Ashburner and Friston, ). Prior to modulation, the images were segmented in gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid volumes.…”

Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke

“…For instance, according to the social context network model [37,75], damage to interoceptive hubs in bvFTD may affect salience attribution during social cognition deficits (e.g. [57,[76][77][78]). Moreover, interoceptive tasks and the HEP have been linked to emotion and social cognition [5,79].…”