Integration of ISO 31000:2009 and Supply Chain Risk Management

Scannell, Thomas V.; Curkovic, Sime; Wagner, Bret

doi:10.4236/ajibm.2013.34043

Cited by 16 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hendricks et al (2009) cite a survey among 151 executives, of whom 73% stated their firms had experienced supply chain disruptions in the past five years and 48% expected the risk to increase in the next three years. Scannell et al (2013) conclude that a risk-oriented supply chain enables firms to obtain strong competitive advantage and provides reliable long-term benefits for all stakeholders.…”

Section: Supply Chain Risk Management (Scrm)mentioning

confidence: 90%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Supply chain risk management at seaport container terminals

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since seaports are common and crucial links in the supply chains of several organizations, the objective of this work was to identify what risks a port can offer to the organizations in its chain and how they are treated by the port’s managers. An exploratory survey was carried out using semi-structured interviews with employees of the company that operates the container and coal terminal of the second largest Brazilian port. The results revealed there is no structured risk management process by the port administration, but several actions taken revealed concern for reaction to risk situations. This highlights the benefits of clarifying the issues, contributing to the literature and assisting professionals in structuring a supply chain risk management process.

show abstract

Section: Supply Chain Risk Management (Scrm)mentioning

confidence: 90%

“…Any risk of interruption of the flow between a company and supplier that prevents the supplier from satisfying its commitment to reliability. Diabat et al (2012), Pfohl et al (2010), Scannell et al (2013).…”

Section: Risks Description Authors Supplymentioning

confidence: 99%

Supply chain risk management at seaport container terminals

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding the relevance of the theme, Xia & Chen (2011) believe that SCRM has a strong influence on the establishment of cooperation among commercial partners and the performance of the entire chain. In turn, Scannell et al (2013) conclude that a focus on managing risks in supply chains establishes a competitive position and long-term benefits to stakeholders.…”

Section: Risks and Their Management In Supply Chainsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supply chain risk management (SCRM) has a strong influence on the cooperation among partners and the performance of the entire production chain. A supply chain designed to minimize risks enables firms to establish a competitive position and provides long-term benefits to stakeholders. The SCRM system should be structured to manage both routine and extraordinary risks, such as natural disasters and major accidents. The risks should be managed both reactively, by monitoring changes in the chain, the needs of customers, technology and the strategies of suppliers and competitors, among others, to enable quick reaction to events; and proactively, to identify risks and implement actions to prevent them or minimize their impacts. The basic risk management process consists of identifying, evaluating, mitigating and controlling risks. The objective of this paper is to analyze how a carmaker identifies and manages the risk factors in its supply chain. To achieve this aim, we performed a qualitative, applied and exploratory field study of a Brazilian automaker. The data were collected by structured interviews, and the analytic hierarchy process was applied to rank the risk factors, resulting in a risk matrix that can be an instrument for making decisions by the company studied.

show abstract

“…Luko [16] reviewed the terminology and language and used the new guidelines as adopted in the United States as ANSI/ASSE Z690.2-2011 and concluded that ISO 31000 provided a good framework for managing quality and business risks through integration. Scannell et al [23] investigated the supply chain risk management (SCRM) approaches and determined that ISO 31000 included the core steps used in SCRM but included two additional steps and so this was more comprehensive. This research also revealed that companies recognised the importance of SCRM but lacked skills and the ability to integrate these into ISO 31000.…”

Section: Published Research On Iso 31000mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…to complement other conventional risk management systems [7,23,24]. This includes systems-based approaches.…”

Section: Iso 31000 Supplemented Other Risk Management Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Utility of M-31000 for Managing Health and Safety Risks: A Pilot Investigation

Pillay¹

2018

Occupational Health and Safety - A Multi-Regional Perspective

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The management of occupational health and safety (OHS) risks is an important part of any business. ISO 31000 risk management has been suggested to represent the natural standard for integrating OHS risk management into business operations. However, published research on this standard is very limited, so its ability to influence the management of OHS risks is unknown. The aim of this chapter is to report on the first part of the findings of a pilot study aimed at investigating the utility of the ISO 31000 risk management standard for managing occupational health and safety (OHS) risks. A review of the published literature on ISO 31000 is presented first. This is followed by a modified theoretical framework, M-31000, taking into account OHS risk management practice. The results of 42/149 key informants selected as part of a purposive sampling strategy identified three main advantages of ISO 31000, including acting as a good starting point for risk management, supplementing other risk management strategies, and allowing for easier integration with other similar strategies. The two main shortfalls identified in this pilot included the standard being vague and difficult to implement. The study also revealed that M-31000 was much simpler and more consistent with safety management practice.

show abstract

Integration of ISO 31000:2009 and Supply Chain Risk Management

Cited by 16 publications

References 40 publications

Supply chain risk management at seaport container terminals

Supply chain risk management at seaport container terminals

Supply chain risk management and risk ranking in the automotive industry

The Utility of M-31000 for Managing Health and Safety Risks: A Pilot Investigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About