2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2012.6256571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Learning Classifier Systems with simultaneous localisation and mapping for autonomous robotics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid ML-ER approaches include Genetic-based Machine Learning, and specifically Learning Classifier Systems variants [20,21], based on the evolutionary learning of sets of (condition-action) or (condition-action-effect) rules. While LCS rules enable in principle to control both the robot and its internal state, GBML seemingly faces scalability issues compared to Neural Nets and even more to new NN-based controller representations [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hybrid ML-ER approaches include Genetic-based Machine Learning, and specifically Learning Classifier Systems variants [20,21], based on the evolutionary learning of sets of (condition-action) or (condition-action-effect) rules. While LCS rules enable in principle to control both the robot and its internal state, GBML seemingly faces scalability issues compared to Neural Nets and even more to new NN-based controller representations [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison with other ER approaches, specifically[20,22], faces the difficulty of defining a fitness function: building a fitness function from the exploration indicators is inappropriate since computing them requires some ground truth; but the whole motivation of the approach is to handle cases where the ground truth is not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A learning iteration is a single traversal of the robot from the start location to the goal location, one iteration of the ACS process. This is based on previous work which has shown localisation improvements occurring within 10 learning iterations in similar work [103]. Between each learning iteration only the CAM (classifier populations) is kept, the full SLAM map (mental map) from each respective SLAM approach is discarded at the end of each iteration.…”
Section: Chapter 4 Cognitive Action Mapping Slam Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%