The deep tight sandstone reservoir is characterized by small pores, narrow throats, and poor connectivity. The wireline logging responses are so complex, and especially, it is difficult to identify fluid types by previous resistivity-porosity cross-plot method. Based on the differences of acoustic, density, and neutron logging responses in gas and water-saturated layers, some effective sensitivity factors to fluids are constructed for gas-bearing layer identification. From conventional logging principle, the acoustic-neutron porosity difference, density-neutron porosity difference, and triple-porosity ratio are all sensitive parameters to the gas-bearing layer. From the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging response mechanism, the density and NMR porosity difference, and T2 geometric mean of the movable fluid are also two sensitive parameters. Based on the above parameters, a series of fluid typing cross-plots are constructed and their adaptabilities are compared. By contrast, the interpretation result from NMR logging are better, and dual-porosity difference and triple-porosity ratio method from conventional logs are also effective when NMR logging is not available. In log interpretation, these methods are used to gives their results, respectively, and then they are combined together by vote strategy according the performance of every cross-plot, therefore, the comprehensive fluid typing method is proposed. In two case studies of Kuqa Depression of Tarim foreland basin, China, the comprehensive fluid typing method proves effective and novel, and it is another alternative method for fluid identification using non-electrical logs when the electrical logs is not available or applicable.