Integration of Production Facilities and Reservoir Simulation for Comparison of Subsea and Conventional Lift Technologies - (SPE-164850)

Teixeira, Gleber; Schiozer, Denis José

doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20130857

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reference [10] sums the main criteria for selection to be additional recovery, hydraulic deliverability, thermal behavior, flow assurance and capital cost. Although, they were referring to subsea gas / liquid separation, it is also applicable to the other equipment groups while [11] argued that subsea gas liquid separation is the most advanced technology for deepwater comparing gas liquid separation with gas lift…”

Section: State Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

Current Trend in the Oil and Gas Industry on Subsea Processing Equipment

Shobowale

Hashim

2013

AMM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Typically from the industry, the decision on when to deploy subsea processing equipment is a big investment decision and quite a number of the operating oil and gas industry are waiting and monitoring the trend from the big players in the industry. There are quite a number of publications on these equipment groups but it has been based on different issues. There is a need to investigate the current trend on the assessment and selection from both the operators and the equipment manufacturers/suppliers perspective. A technology questionnaire survey was designed and administered to experts in this field. The result reveals Risk and RAM analysis as the most used assessment method; also expert systems has gained some level of acceptability in the final selection process. Some of the criterias such as gas volume variation that are considered not critical in the literature are still ranked as critical by the experts. The experts also suggested other important issues that should be taken into consideration for effective selection and assessment.

show abstract

Section: State Of Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%