2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging improves mild cognitive impairment detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the protection toward bias offered by a datadriven approach and a sample of comparable or larger size than that of other studies, [16][17][18][19][20] the outcome is still the result of feature and algorithm definition. Although we selected "standard" cognitive tests and segmentation/parcellation atlases, and 2 basic machine-learning algorithms, we cannot rule out the possibility that other methodological choices might have yielded slightly different patterns of findings.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the protection toward bias offered by a datadriven approach and a sample of comparable or larger size than that of other studies, [16][17][18][19][20] the outcome is still the result of feature and algorithm definition. Although we selected "standard" cognitive tests and segmentation/parcellation atlases, and 2 basic machine-learning algorithms, we cannot rule out the possibility that other methodological choices might have yielded slightly different patterns of findings.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A number of recent studies have implemented these classificatory techniques to identify MCI patients using RS-fMRI as a single source of diagnostic information, [15][16][17][18] or in combination with sMRI. [19][20][21] In this study we used machine-learning methods to carry out classifications of participants with a diagnosis of MCI based on features extracted from cognitive performance, sMRI, and RS-fMRI, with a series of single-type and mixed classifiers. No specific hypothesis was formulated in association with cognitive classifiers as the diagnostic status was heavily dependent on cognitive performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that combined multivariate or multimodal data – structural MRI including cortical thickness, volume, and tensor-based morphemotry, functional MRI, FDG-PET, and non-imaging data including CSF biomarker and neurocognition – could improve diagnostic power (Desikan et al, 2009; Fan et al, 2008; Hinrichs et al, 2011; Kim and Lee, 2012; Park et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2011), and combining cortical gray matter thickness and white matter surface measures could increase prediction accuracy in autism (Ecker et al, 2010). In this paper, we present the first study to integrate cortical white matter surface geometric and cortical thickness measures on the cortical surface vertices to discriminate very mild AD from cognitively normal controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the in-brain mask that overlapped across all fMRI volumes and all subjects was used to define the final set of input voxels (Kim et al, 2013; Kim and Lee, 2013), resulting in a total of 74,484 in-brain voxels. The BOLD intensities of the fMRI volumes within a task-related period (i.e., three blocks of 20-s task periods after a 6-s delay from the task onset for each fMRI run) were normalized to percent signal change relative to the average BOLD signal with the 80-s baseline period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%