Integration of sustainability in engineering education

Abstract

Purpose Education for sustainable development (ESD) is one of the challenges engineering education currently faces. Engineering education needs to revise and change its curriculum to integrate ESD principles and knowledge. Problem based learning (PBL) has been one of the main learning pedagogies used to integrate sustainability in engineering education. However, there is a lack of understanding of the relation between ESD and PBL principles and the ways in which they can be integrated and practised in the engineering curricula. This paper aims to investigate the relation between PBL and ESD and the ways in which they are integrated and practised in the engineering curricula. Design/methodology/approach The study starts with a review of the literature concerning ESD and PBL theories where relations between both are defined. The literature review is followed by an empirical work in which the PBL and ESD relations are investigated in relation to the PBL engineering curricula. The empirical work involves two engineering master programmes from Aalborg University, Denmark, while documentary analysis and interviews are used as methods for data collection. Findings The results show that even though PBL and ESD share common learning principles, their practice presents limitations that challenge the full integration of sustainability, namely, the crowded, strict and academic-centred curriculum, the struggle to balance different contexts with professional, interdisciplinary and collaborative knowledge and the tacit presence of sustainability. Originality/value The existence of a PBL curriculum at institutional level, such as at Aalborg University, enables investigation of how the PBL and ESD principles are practised, highlighting the limitations and potentials of integrating sustainability in the engineering curriculum.

Analyzing Sustainability Awareness among Higher Education Faculty Members: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia

“…These new pillars are the cultural diversity pillar, political pillar, and spiritual pillar. Educators must better understand these concepts to upgrade their disciplines and develop effective educational projects and to act as agents in promoting these principles within society [27].…”

Electrical Engineering Education for a Sustainable World: Adjustment of Academic Programs in Ecuador

“…According to the Council for the Evaluation Accreditation and Quality Assurance of Higher Education [23], Ecuador counts 55 institutions classified based on academic quality standards into category A (8 universities), category B (28), and category C (19). Whereof eleven offer EE programs but only ten were considered because of their participation in the survey and the program-related information available online.…”

“…Furthermore, some universities contemplate new approaches to improve education, such as problem-based learning curriculum, thought for the energy engineering students to learn in an integrated and practical fashion, foreseeing the needs of an evolving field. This type of approaches considers different principles of modern education, such as contextual, collaborative and experiential learning [19].…”

Changes in Electrical Engineering Programs for an Energy Sustainability Inclusive Degree

“…Furthermore, different principles of modern education, such as contextual, collaborative and experiential learning, contemplate the needs of the ever-changing electrical engineering field [10]. For this reason, lecturers are using new approaches, such as problem-based learning, thought for a comprehensive and practical education.…”