Integration of Time-frequency L4 matrix factorization of defect detection with Hilbert transform thermographic inspection

Zhang, Ning; Gao, Bin; Wu, Tongle; Wang, Meiling; Yang, Yang; Yu, Yongjie; Feng, Shun

doi:10.1016/j.infrared.2021.103844

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have been widely applied in aerospace owing to their light weight, high specific strength, and excellent fatigue resistance. [1][2][3][4] Joining is an inevitable process in manufacturing composite structural parts, especially those with large dimensions and complex DOI: 10.1002/mame.202200463 geometries. Currently, the joining technique of structural parts made of CFRP mainly includes three methods: mechanical fastening (bolt/rivet), bonding (adhesive), and a combination of bolt/rivet and adhesive.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Moisture Absorption‐Drying of Composite Materials on the Bonding Performance of the Joints

Chen

Zhang

et al. 2022

Macro Materials & Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Composite materials are susceptible to environmental threats correlated to moisture absorption, which affects the bonding performance of the joints. Therefore, drying should be taken into account during actual manufacturing operations. In this work, the influence of moisture absorption‐drying of composite materials on the bonding performance of the joints is investigated to provide a theoretical direction for the co‐bonding process. Firstly, the surfaces of composite materials are treated with three methods: sanding, dry peel ply, and wet peel ply. Secondly, the composite materials are subjected to moisture absorption‐drying treatment at 26 °C/65% relative humidity (RH) and 70 °C/85% RH. Finally, the above materials are bonded to evaluate the bonding performance. These results show that the bonding performance of the joints treated with two peel plies decreases significantly after moisture absorption. After moisture absorption‐drying at 26 °C/65% RH, the bonding performance of the joints treated with dry peel ply cannot fully recover, while wet peel ply can be fully recoverable. However, the bonding performance of all joints cannot fully recover after absorbing moisture‐drying at 70 °C/85% RH, whose recovery has relations with surface treatment.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%