2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of traditional and innovative characterization techniques for flux-based assessment of Dense Non-aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial pe-remediation mass was estimated using the reported inventory of solvent disposal for the MOT site. For the PGN and CD sites, the initial pre-remediation mass was estimated based on fitting a mass-depletion function to the temporal contaminant mass discharge data (Butcher and Gauthier, 1994; Basu et al, 2009; Brusseau et al, 2013). The power function is one such, widely used, function (e.g., Zhu and Sykes, 2004; Falta et al, 2005): normaldnormalM/normaldnormalt=false(Q0C0/normalM0Γfalse)MΓ where C 0 is initial contaminant concentration, M 0 is initial contaminant mass, M is contaminant mass at time t, Q 0 is initial discharge, Q is discharge at time t, and Γ is the power index term, representing the impact of a host of conditions and processes on mass-removal behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial pe-remediation mass was estimated using the reported inventory of solvent disposal for the MOT site. For the PGN and CD sites, the initial pre-remediation mass was estimated based on fitting a mass-depletion function to the temporal contaminant mass discharge data (Butcher and Gauthier, 1994; Basu et al, 2009; Brusseau et al, 2013). The power function is one such, widely used, function (e.g., Zhu and Sykes, 2004; Falta et al, 2005): normaldnormalM/normaldnormalt=false(Q0C0/normalM0Γfalse)MΓ where C 0 is initial contaminant concentration, M 0 is initial contaminant mass, M is contaminant mass at time t, Q 0 is initial discharge, Q is discharge at time t, and Γ is the power index term, representing the impact of a host of conditions and processes on mass-removal behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For long-term monitoring, a permanent device is more appropriate to avoid these variations of measured concentrations. Chlorinated solvent monitoring with the multilevel sampler showed that the most contaminated layer was located at a depth between 4 and 6 m. However, this does not mean that the flux of contaminant is maximum at this depth [19]. Indeed, the flux in the most contaminated layer may be low and consequently limit the decontamination efficiency [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whilst higher resolution site assessment alternative technologies have become increasingly recommended (Anneser et al, 2008;Basu et al, 2009;Kram et al, 2001;ITRC, 2015), their use is still perceived to represent a small fraction of the site characterization effort worldwide that still predominantly involves monitoring wells. Alternatives to characterize source-zone mass distribution include, detailed core sampling (Parker et al, 2003), inter-well partitioning tracer tests (Annable et al, 1998) and direct-push methods involving direct water sampling ("groundwater profiling") and indirect measurements using sensorbased tools such as the Membrane Interface Probe (Adamson et al, 2014;Guilbeault et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%