2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2018.8665148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Visual Information and Robot Offline Programming System for Improving Automatic Deburring Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If, on the other hand, the feed rate is too high, the tool can be unable to remove the burr. Methods have been proposed to adjust the feed rate based on burr height (Lai et al, 2018;Xiong et al 2018), where the feed rate is adjusted based on given burr height thresholds.…”
Section: Adjusting Feed Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, the feed rate is too high, the tool can be unable to remove the burr. Methods have been proposed to adjust the feed rate based on burr height (Lai et al, 2018;Xiong et al 2018), where the feed rate is adjusted based on given burr height thresholds.…”
Section: Adjusting Feed Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vision system is used to recognise the edges of the workpiece. Like with the CAD/CAM method, the outline formed by the edges of the workpiece become the deburring path [8], [9].…”
Section: Deburring Pipelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a vision-assisted robot offline programming system has been developed. The edges of the workpiece used for testing are all straight.…”
Section: Sensor-based Path Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous reduction of production and project time in the conditions of current automated systems requires the use of offline programming of industrial robots [5]. These methods can provide solutions for the integration of models of real devices, for finding appropriate solutions, whether for the layout of workplaces, the range of robotic arms and possibly for testing the technologies avoiding the installation of a real robotic cell [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%