2013
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal

Abstract: The cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (http://cbioportal.org) provides a Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimensional cancer genomics data. The portal reduces molecular profiling data from cancer tissues and cell lines into readily understandable genetic, epigenetic, gene expression, and proteomic events. The query interface combined with customized data storage enables researchers to interactively explore genetic alterations across samples, genes, and pathways and, when available in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

187
11,539
18
26

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12,588 publications
(12,257 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
187
11,539
18
26
Order By: Relevance
“…52 GISTIC-processed copy number data were obtained from cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org/). 53,54 In aggregate, 1,895 evaluable cases had corresponding gene expression, mutation count and overall survival data. Gene expression profiles were generated using the Illumina_Human_WG-v3 array platform 24 and normalized by quantile normalization with linear modeling batch correction, as described elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…52 GISTIC-processed copy number data were obtained from cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org/). 53,54 In aggregate, 1,895 evaluable cases had corresponding gene expression, mutation count and overall survival data. Gene expression profiles were generated using the Illumina_Human_WG-v3 array platform 24 and normalized by quantile normalization with linear modeling batch correction, as described elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression profiles were generated using the Illumina_Human_WG-v3 array platform 24 and normalized by quantile normalization with linear modeling batch correction, as described elsewhere. 55 Copy number levels were generated on the Affymetrix SNP Array 6.0 and normalized using the supervised normalization of microarrays (SNM) framework 56 as described by 55 and also using DNAcopy 54,57 to define low- and high-level copy number thresholds. A 173-gene exome sequencing panel was used to identify somatic gene mutations and generate measures of mutational burden (gene count).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cBioPortal (Cerami et al ., 2012; Gao et al ., 2013) (http://www.cbioportal.org/index.do) database contains the most well‐organized and comprehensive data on cancer genetics for various cancer types. The TCGA Provisional datasets for individual cancer types cover genetic abnormalities, transcriptomes determined by either cDNA microarray or RNA sequencing, and the detailed clinical characteristics including disease outcomes (recurrence and mortality).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest TCGA Provisional dataset within the cBioPortal database (Cerami et al ., 2012; Gao et al ., 2013) (http://www.cbioportal.org/index.do), which includes 492 patients with follow‐up data, was used to derive 696 DEGs that are associated with the 9‐gene signature of the MUC1 genomic network (Lin et al ., 2017). These DEGs were defined at q  < 0.001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variants were then compared with the following public databases; the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP) together with 1000 Genomes (Abecasis et al, 2012), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500) (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), Cambridge, MA (URL:http://exac.broadinstitute.org). Selected variants with a MAF <1% were also compared with cbioportal (http://www.cbioportal.org/) (Cerami et al, 2012; Gao et al, 2013) and the COSMIC database (Forbes et al, 2015). To distinguish variants from local polymorphisms between 200 and 248 anonymized in‐house normal control blood samples were sequenced over the positions of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%