2011
DOI: 10.1101/gad.17446611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses

Abstract: Large intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs) are emerging as key regulators of diverse cellular processes. Determining the function of individual lincRNAs remains a challenge. Recent advances in RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and computational methods allow for an unprecedented analysis of such transcripts. Here, we present an integrative approach to define a reference catalog of >8000 human lincRNAs. Our catalog unifies previously existing annotation sources with transcripts we assembled from RNA-seq data collected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

293
3,517
8
33

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,183 publications
(3,851 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(89 reference statements)
293
3,517
8
33
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, some established ceRNAs neither share an unusually high number of predicted MREs with their mRNA targets nor are especially abundant (Cesana et al 2011;Wang et al 2013), which suggests that other factors, such as miRNA-target affinity or miRNA turnover, might explain their efficient crosstalk. These ceRNAs are also no different from most other lncRNAs (Cabili et al 2011;Derrien et al 2012) with respect to their highly restricted spatial and temporal expression patterns. For example, linc-MD1 is a muscle-specific ceRNA that regulates transcript abundance of two key myogenic transcription factors, Maml1 and Mef2c, which are required for activating muscle-specific gene expression (Cesana et al 2011); in addition, linc-RoR competes for miR-145 binding with key self-renewal transcription factor transcripts, namely Nanog, Pou5f1, and Sox2, and is expressed during induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming and in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (Loewer et al 2010;Wang et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, some established ceRNAs neither share an unusually high number of predicted MREs with their mRNA targets nor are especially abundant (Cesana et al 2011;Wang et al 2013), which suggests that other factors, such as miRNA-target affinity or miRNA turnover, might explain their efficient crosstalk. These ceRNAs are also no different from most other lncRNAs (Cabili et al 2011;Derrien et al 2012) with respect to their highly restricted spatial and temporal expression patterns. For example, linc-MD1 is a muscle-specific ceRNA that regulates transcript abundance of two key myogenic transcription factors, Maml1 and Mef2c, which are required for activating muscle-specific gene expression (Cesana et al 2011); in addition, linc-RoR competes for miR-145 binding with key self-renewal transcription factor transcripts, namely Nanog, Pou5f1, and Sox2, and is expressed during induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming and in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (Loewer et al 2010;Wang et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low transcript abundance of most lncRNAs (Cabili et al 2011;Derrien et al 2012) might be thought to limit their ability to effectively modulate, in a miRNA-dependent manner, mRNA abundance (Ebert and Sharp 2010;Ala et al 2013;Figliuzzi et al 2013;Denzler et al 2014). Nevertheless, some established ceRNAs neither share an unusually high number of predicted MREs with their mRNA targets nor are especially abundant (Cesana et al 2011;Wang et al 2013), which suggests that other factors, such as miRNA-target affinity or miRNA turnover, might explain their efficient crosstalk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lincRNAs have been described in yeast as well as higher eukaryotes (Bumgarner et al, 2009;Khalil et al, 2009;Ulitsky et al, 2011), and genome-wide analysis has uncovered more than 8000 lincRNA genes in the human genome (Khalil et al, 2009;Chen and Carmichael, 2010;Cabili et al, 2011). Mammalian lincRNAs are suggested to be transcribed by RNA polymerase II and processed by both 59-capping and 39 poly(A) addition (Guttman et al, 2009), and many contain introns (Managadze et al, 2011;Ulitsky et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammalian lincRNAs are suggested to be transcribed by RNA polymerase II and processed by both 59-capping and 39 poly(A) addition (Guttman et al, 2009), and many contain introns (Managadze et al, 2011;Ulitsky et al, 2011). lincRNAs are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, and many lincRNA genes are regulated by stress (Dinger et al, 2008;Cabili et al, 2011). Moreover, ;20% of the 3300 lincRNAs in human cells are associated with polycomb repressor complex 2 (Hekimoglu and Ringrose, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also carried out bioinformatics analyses for transcription factor binding sites, noncoding RNA, and histone modifications in the publically available data set from human mature B cells and other human B-linage cells, and known locations for these did not correlate with the fragile zones (see Fig. S9 to S12 in the supplemental material) (37,38). However, the BCL2-MBR, CCND1-MTC, and MALT1 regions are nearly fully methylated in the H1 human embryonic stem cell line based on the publicly available genome-wide sodium bisulfite sequencing data set (GEO Accession Viewer no.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%