2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315171456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative Framing Analysis

Abstract: While there is a plethora of visual communication and media framing books, there is a paucity of research that combines both textual and visual framing approaches. Viorela Dan's book is well positioned to fill this important scholarly gap in the area of framing analysis. Building on theoretical and methodological strengths of existing framing studies, the book offers a clear and comprehensive overview of what has been done in this area to date and where we need to go from here. The book will provide an invalua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 243 publications
(462 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our second suggestion concerns the use of visuals in corrections. Given that the human brain is attracted to images and hardwired to trust that which they record as reality (Coleman, 2010), it seems advisable to support corrective messages with visual cues and evidence (Dan, 2018(Dan, , 2021. Existing research found verbal and visual corrections to be more enjoyable and more convincing than purely textual corrections (Amazeen et al, 2016;Garrett et al, 2013;Hameleers et al, 2020), especially those employing a video format (Young et al, 2018).…”
Section: Proposition 1: Increase the Appeal Of Corrective Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our second suggestion concerns the use of visuals in corrections. Given that the human brain is attracted to images and hardwired to trust that which they record as reality (Coleman, 2010), it seems advisable to support corrective messages with visual cues and evidence (Dan, 2018(Dan, , 2021. Existing research found verbal and visual corrections to be more enjoyable and more convincing than purely textual corrections (Amazeen et al, 2016;Garrett et al, 2013;Hameleers et al, 2020), especially those employing a video format (Young et al, 2018).…”
Section: Proposition 1: Increase the Appeal Of Corrective Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%