understanding how engineering students develop their professional identity, the role of emotion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplar engineering faculty that have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her university and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.
Karen Sweeney Gerow, University of GeorgiaKaren Sweeney Gerow is pursuing her PhD in the Lamar Dodd School of Art at the University of Georgia. Her research interests include STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math) education, narrative inquiry, and interdisciplinary studies. She is also the founding director of the Double Helix STEAM School in Athens, GA.
Dr. Joachim Walther, University of GeorgiaDr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work.His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students' professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research.His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia. When engaged with engineering education research, whether it was quantitative or qualitative, I often found myself with this nagging feeling that something important was missing. Many of the common research methods used within our community involve breaking down data into smaller pieces, e.g., codes and categories, or numbers of occurrences. It seemed to me that something more was within the data but was not surfacing during the research project. As a researcher, I felt as if I was not accessing the full potential of my research project.While working on a research project exploring the role of creativity in a transdisciplinary art and engineering context, I realized that we were missing the story. The pre and post quantitative data indicated that students were more creative after engaging in the transdisciplinary design studio 1 and the qualitative data supported this outcome with focus groups and written reflections that were analyzed using phenomenological approaches. 2 I took some of the previously collected data and tested the idea of using narrative analysis as a way of uncovering important stories that could have strong implications for the research study and for the readers.3 Narrative analysis ...