2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-015-2125-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrative treatment for low back pain: An exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Integrative treatment that combines CAM with conventional therapies appeared to have beneficial effects on pain and function. However, evidence is limited due to heterogeneity, the relatively small numbers available for subgroup analyses and the low methodological quality of the included trials. Identification of studies of true IM was not possible due to lack of reporting of the intervention details (registration No. CRD42013003916).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this background and taking into account the existence of unmet care and follow-up care of low back (25), our aim is to describe and compare the impact in a sample of people with SLBP and general population without LBP with normalized reference values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this background and taking into account the existence of unmet care and follow-up care of low back (25), our aim is to describe and compare the impact in a sample of people with SLBP and general population without LBP with normalized reference values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies declared that hand to floor test can be used as a sensitive and objective index (33) These results explicit the use of IM to promote adherence to AT and also cost-effectiveness and feasibility of employing AT in developing countries. In Hue et al study in 2015, it was stated that AT training coupled by exercise, created more cost-effectiveness (34). However, it is necessary to maintain motivation by providing personal support and texting persuasive SMSs or reminder classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] Due to the promising empirical data, combined with greater safety relative to pharmacotherapy and potential health care cost savings among those who use NPTs compared to those who do not, 26 NPTs are being increasingly recommended. 27 For individuals with chronic low back pain, NPTs are now recommended by the American College of Physicians as a first-line intervention. 25 Among patients with musculoskeletal pain, estimates of the prevalence of use for various NPTs for pain management range from 6 to 58%, with massage or chiropractic interventions being the most common and yoga or herbal supplements the least common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%