Integriertes Innovationsmanagement – Vom Umfeldscanning zur Roadmap

Durst, Carolin; Durst, Michael

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09722-6_12

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(Saviz & Blum, 2002) Environmental Scanning (B.L.& Monterde, 2015) External Search (Dong & Netten, 2017) Future Studies (Porter & Cunningham, 2005) Futures Research (Porter & Cunningham, 2005). Horizon Scanning (Ricciardi et al, 2017;Douw et al, 2006) Opportunities Analysis (Porter & Cunningham, 2005) Scanning Method (Honda et al, 2017) Scenario Analysis (Rohrbeck, 2013) Scenario Foresight (Boe-Lillegraven & Monterde, 2015) Scenario Planning (Boe-Lillegraven & Monterde, 2015) Strategic Analysis (Iden et al, 2017) Technology Assessment (Porter & Cunningham, 2005) Technology Mapping (Halicka, 2017) Technology Monitoring (Yan & Cai, 2011) Technology Opportunity Analysis Technology Opportunity Discovery Technology Radar (Rohrbeck et al, 2006) Technology Roadmapping (Gudanowska, 2014) Technology Scanning (Yan & Cai, 2011) Technology Scouting (Rohrbeck, 2007) Technology Search (Greitemann et al, 2017) Technology Seeking (Yan & Cai, 2011) Technology Watch (Yan & Cai, 2011) Trend Extrapolation (Rohrbeck, 2013) Trend Radar (Durst & Durst, 2016) Table 2 offers explanations for most of the methods, however some conflicts in the literature exist related to these definitions, and some methods cannot be separated from another based on this table. These conflicts and differences are further explained.…”

Section: Table 1: Auxiliary Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

External Technology Searching Methods - A Literature Review

Kujawa¹,

Paetzold²

2019

Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a preliminary assessment of the literature available in the field of External Technology Searching. Many methods exist to enable companies to take advantage of new technologies and apply them to achieve a competitive advantage. This literature review focuses on reducing complexity and providing clarity related to the numerous different terms and methodologies used throughout the literature. The main methods found in the literature include: Technology Foresight, Technology Forecasting, Technology Intelligence, and Technology Scouting. However, many additional terms have also been used to describe similar strategies, leading to inconsistency in the use of the terms, resulting in confusion and missed opportunities to innovate for those trying to navigate the field. Synthesis of the results assists in clarifying the differences and conflicts in the literature between the numerous terms. The results serve to display the state of the art on the field and present a basis for further research.

show abstract

Section: Table 1: Auxiliary Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

External Technology Searching Methods - A Literature Review

Kujawa¹,

Paetzold²

2019

Proc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, the innovation process does not start with gathering and developing ideas, but rather with defining search fields for localizing where to innovate. A strategic innovation search field (ISF) is described by trends affecting the firm, by technologies, or by customer needs, and serves as a starting point for idea generation (Durst & Durst, 2016). Based on this understanding, assessing ISFs is a combined task of opportunity identification and opportunity analysis during early stages of the innovation process, as defined by Koen et al (2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Without defining ISFs, ideas are often not in line with market needs or actual requirements. In consequence, plenty of ideas are existent, but very few or none advance into realization (Durst & Durst, 2016). This points out the high relevance of assessing ISFs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%