2021
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2019.2956936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrity for Multi-Sensor Cooperative Positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the recent disclosure of GNSS raw measurements in the mass market GNSS receivers (such as for the embedded chipsets in the smartphones), developers, and researchers can now access raw GNSS observables (e.g., code/phase raw pseudorange measurements and Doppler measurements) prior to their actual use in PVT computation [40][41][42]. Such data can be transmitted, synchronised, and combined among different asynchronous users to reciprocally improve the positioning performance, the mutual situational awareness, and to open a variety of new solutions for the monitoring of GNSS integrity within a network of users [43,44]. As assessed within the HANSEL project and described in Section 4, the combination of GNSS raw pseudorange measurements can be exploited to determine the inter-agent distance (a.k.a.)…”
Section: Dgnss-based Cooperative Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the recent disclosure of GNSS raw measurements in the mass market GNSS receivers (such as for the embedded chipsets in the smartphones), developers, and researchers can now access raw GNSS observables (e.g., code/phase raw pseudorange measurements and Doppler measurements) prior to their actual use in PVT computation [40][41][42]. Such data can be transmitted, synchronised, and combined among different asynchronous users to reciprocally improve the positioning performance, the mutual situational awareness, and to open a variety of new solutions for the monitoring of GNSS integrity within a network of users [43,44]. As assessed within the HANSEL project and described in Section 4, the combination of GNSS raw pseudorange measurements can be exploited to determine the inter-agent distance (a.k.a.)…”
Section: Dgnss-based Cooperative Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although BRAIM does not require measurement redundancy, the fusion of GNSS pseudoranges and terrestrial ranges should positively affect the a posteriori distribution (shown in Gabela et al., 2019) and, consequently, the integrity. The fusion of GNSS and terrestrial ranges (as defined and used in this paper) in integrity monitoring of land‐based applications is not common, and we were able to find only two studies that have done this (J. Liu et al., 2020; Xiong et al., 2019). It is also worth mentioning that similar efforts of ensuring sufficient measurement redundancy previously have been made for civil aviation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative Integrity Monitoring is proposed by Xiong et al. (2019) in addition to the FDE algorithm that is capable of better detection of GNSS faults than classic RAIM, and of detecting multiple faulty cooperative measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, for example, vehicles can periodically broadcast messages to other vehicles which can benefit from them in a plethora of manners. In particular, position information and auxiliary range data can be used, under certain conditions, to assess or refine the quality of the GNSS positioning solutions in a cooperative fashion [11], [12]. Ranging associated to the position estimate of a set of users actually provides opportunistic, additional landmarks to the positioning problem faced by conventional GNSS receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%