Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises

Abstract

We examine the relationship between the intellectual capital of scientists making frontier discoveries, the presence of great university bioscience programs, the presence of venture capital firms, other economic variables, and the founding of U.S. biotechnology enterprises during 1976-1989. Using a linked cross-section/time-series panel data set, we find that the timing and location of the birth of biotech enterprises is determined primarily by intellectual capital measures, particularly the local number of highly productive "star" scientists actively publishing genetic sequence discoveries. Great universities are likely to grow and recruit star scientists, but their effect is separable from the universities. When the intellectual capital measures are included in our poisson regressions, the number of venture capital finns in an area reduces the probability of foundings. At least early in the process, star scientists appear to be the scaice, immobile factors of production. Our focus on intellectual capital is related to knowledge spillovers, but in this case "natural excludability" permits capture of supranonnal returns by scientists. Given this reward structure technology transfer was vigorous without any special intermediating structures. We believe biotechnology may be prototypical of the birth patterns in other innovative industries.

Modes of organizing biomedical innovation in the UK and US and the role of integrative and relational capabilities

“…For example, in her study of innovation in tissue-engineered cartilage, Murray (2002) found that the commercialization of science into new medical treatments depends crucially on overlapping, but distinctive, scientific and technological networks at the institutional level. Connections to scientific networks, via key individuals who work at the interstices of such networks, provide 'knowledge spillover' effects that shape technological progress and influence firms' abilities to develop intellectual capital (Zucker et al 1998). This finding echoes earlier research on the important role of 'boundary spanners' who broker relationships across networks (e.g.…”

“…The importance of 'star scientists' has been noted elsewhere, but usually in terms of the role such individuals play in linking commercial activity to the knowledge base of academe (Zucker et al, 1998). Whilst this was important (and discussed above), here we use the term 'Figurehead' to highlight also their symbolic and motivational effects.…”

Inventors and Entrepreneurs in Academia: What Types of Skills and Experience Matter?

“…Academic entrepreneurship research shows that working at the frontier gives academic scientists comparative advantage for identifying new breakthrough opportunities (Zucker et al, 1998;Franzoni and Lissoni, 2007). There is a large body of empirical research showing that researchers who are very active contributors to the pool of technological opportunities, tend to be particularly prominent in their respective fields.…”

Les plates-formes technologiques dans les sciences de la vie

“…Plutôt que la coexistence de deux univers de recherche bien différenciés, plusieurs auteurs y observent, au contraire, la constitution de réseaux agglomérés associant laboratoires publics et entreprises privées pour partager des équipements et des compétences (Zucker et al, 1998, Mc Kelvey, 1996. Le développement de spin off issues de la recherche fondamentale, et inversement, l'utilisation massive par les chercheurs de technologies et de services produits par les entreprises pour élaborer des connaissances scientifiques, attestent d'une évolution vers des formes de couplage étroits entre science et innovation.…”