2004
DOI: 10.1108/09696470410538233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual capital in Egyptian software firms

Abstract: The distribution of knowledge around the world varies significantly with developed countries possessing most of the world's current intellectual capital (IC) compared to developing countries. Most IC research has been conducted in a variety of international settings such as the UK, Scandinavia, Australia, Canada, Austria, Malaysia, the USA, and Ireland. However, no empirical research has been conducted at the organizational level in the field of IC in Arab countries. These nations are socially, economically, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Australia, U.K, Canada, USA, Scandinavia, Spain and Denmark). In addition, to the best of our knowledge, only one study -Seleim et al (2004) -has explored IC topic within the context of developing countries like Egypt.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Australia, U.K, Canada, USA, Scandinavia, Spain and Denmark). In addition, to the best of our knowledge, only one study -Seleim et al (2004) -has explored IC topic within the context of developing countries like Egypt.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper is different from Seleim et al (2004) in two crucial aspects: First, we will use a large sample size compared with the sample used in Seleim et al (2004). The current study covers big-knowledge-based companies listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange.…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…High staff turnover is a threat to sustained organizational value and some costs. It may result in the loss of organizational knowledge and memory (Seleim and Ashour 2004). Lower staff turnover means less disruption in the functioning of work groups, reduction in stagnation, and improvement innovation (Addison and Belfield 2004;Seleim and Ashour 2004).…”
Section: Quarterly Half-yearly and Yearly Staff Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%