Abstract:Functional features are investigated and shortcomings in the existing process of sending messages about city problems on the portal «Our St. Petersburg» are revealed. The approach to the development of automatic classification of citizens ' messages by existing on the portal categories is described. Based on the reports submitted by citizens in the amount of 1.5 million, training and test samples were formed in the ratio of 80% and 20% of the main volume of texts, respectively. Based on the training data sampl… Show more
“…Paper ID F-measure [44,45,47,48,57,58,60,64,66,73,77,80,82,86] Precision [43,45,57,60,62,66,67,73,[76][77][78]80,82,86] Accuracy [43,44,46,62,63,69,70,73,[76][77][78]80,82] Recall [45,52,57,60,62,66,73,77,78,80,82,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the collection of citizens' opinions, termed eConsultation, constitutes another category of eParticipation activities that is present in the studies. Most studies in this cluster focus on data analysis from eConsultation platforms [43,46,47]. Additionally, exploration into game design principles to enhance eConsultation initiatives [55] and optimize AI utilization in governance through eConsultation platform data [45] is noted.…”
Section: Eparticipation Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, reference is made to European Union policies concerning the principle of explainable AI [50]. In two papers, legal factors are briefly discussed [46,53]. Lastly, a study addressing challenges in the implementation of an eParticipation initiative highlights the ambiguous legal framework, which partially obstructs activity implementation, compounded by official bodies' inability to furnish clear guidance [81].…”
Electronic Participation (eParticipation) enables citizens to engage in political and decision-making processes using information and communication technologies. As in many other fields, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently started to dictate some of the realities of eParticipation. As a result, an increasing number of studies are investigating the use of AI in eParticipation. The aim of this paper is to map current research on the use of AI in eParticipation. Following PRISMA methodology, the authors identified 235 relevant papers in Web of Science and Scopus and selected 46 studies for review. For analysis purposes, an analysis framework was constructed that combined eParticipation elements (namely actors, activities, effects, contextual factors, and evaluation) with AI elements (namely areas, algorithms, and algorithm evaluation). The results suggest that certain eParticipation actors and activities, as well as AI areas and algorithms, have attracted significant attention from researchers. However, many more remain largely unexplored. The findings can be of value to both academics looking for unexplored research fields and practitioners looking for empirical evidence on what works and what does not.
“…Paper ID F-measure [44,45,47,48,57,58,60,64,66,73,77,80,82,86] Precision [43,45,57,60,62,66,67,73,[76][77][78]80,82,86] Accuracy [43,44,46,62,63,69,70,73,[76][77][78]80,82] Recall [45,52,57,60,62,66,73,77,78,80,82,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the collection of citizens' opinions, termed eConsultation, constitutes another category of eParticipation activities that is present in the studies. Most studies in this cluster focus on data analysis from eConsultation platforms [43,46,47]. Additionally, exploration into game design principles to enhance eConsultation initiatives [55] and optimize AI utilization in governance through eConsultation platform data [45] is noted.…”
Section: Eparticipation Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, reference is made to European Union policies concerning the principle of explainable AI [50]. In two papers, legal factors are briefly discussed [46,53]. Lastly, a study addressing challenges in the implementation of an eParticipation initiative highlights the ambiguous legal framework, which partially obstructs activity implementation, compounded by official bodies' inability to furnish clear guidance [81].…”
Electronic Participation (eParticipation) enables citizens to engage in political and decision-making processes using information and communication technologies. As in many other fields, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently started to dictate some of the realities of eParticipation. As a result, an increasing number of studies are investigating the use of AI in eParticipation. The aim of this paper is to map current research on the use of AI in eParticipation. Following PRISMA methodology, the authors identified 235 relevant papers in Web of Science and Scopus and selected 46 studies for review. For analysis purposes, an analysis framework was constructed that combined eParticipation elements (namely actors, activities, effects, contextual factors, and evaluation) with AI elements (namely areas, algorithms, and algorithm evaluation). The results suggest that certain eParticipation actors and activities, as well as AI areas and algorithms, have attracted significant attention from researchers. However, many more remain largely unexplored. The findings can be of value to both academics looking for unexplored research fields and practitioners looking for empirical evidence on what works and what does not.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.