Intellectual disability health content within medical curriculum: an audit of what our future doctors are taught

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a high burden of unmet health needs for people with intellectual disability. Despite experiencing significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared with the general population, this group faces greater barriers to accessing healthcare. While increasing workplace capacity is one way to reduce this inequitable access, previous research indicates a scarcity of undergraduate teaching in intellectual disability. The aim of the study was to determine the extent and nature of intellectual disability content currently offered within medical degree curricula.MethodsAll Australian universities (n = 20) providing accredited medical training were invited to participate in a two-phase audit via an email invitation to the Dean of each medical school. The Dean’s delegate from 14 medical schools completed Phase 1, which involved a questionnaire or telephone interview about the overall medical course structure. Unit coordinators and/or teaching staff from 12 medical schools completed Phase 2, which involved an online survey about intellectual disability content within the curriculum.ResultsIn Australia, medical school curricula contain a median of 2.55 h of compulsory intellectual disability content. The majority of universities only offer a small amount of compulsory content. Of compulsory units, intellectual disability teaching is minimal in sexual health and emergency medicine (only one unit offered in one school for each). Topics of key relevance in intellectual disability health such as human rights issues, interdisciplinary team work and preventative health are poorly represented in intellectual disability teaching. Elective content varies markedly across universities (1 to 122 h), but emergency medicine, women’s health, men’s health and many other specialist medicine areas are not represented. Inclusive practice is inconsistent in degree and nature, but a majority of universities (nine) involve people with intellectual disability in the development or delivery of content.ConclusionsThere is a mismatch between the considerable unmet health needs of people with intellectual disability and the inconsistent teaching within medical schools. Future doctors will be better equipped to support the health and wellbeing of people with intellectual disability if curricula are enhanced in this area.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0625-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Heterogeneity in age at death for adults with developmental disability

“…Results from this study indicate that training for health care providers (Trollor et al 2016) should devote attention to increased mortality risk among adults with CP or ORDD during the early part of their adult life course, as well as for adults with DS in midlife. Results from this study indicate that training for health care providers (Trollor et al 2016) should devote attention to increased mortality risk among adults with CP or ORDD during the early part of their adult life course, as well as for adults with DS in midlife.…”

“…To ensure accurate data for public health and preventive care efforts aimed at reducing premature mortality for adults with developmental disability, it is imperative for researchers to account for heterogeneity in mortality trends by disability type. Results from this study indicate that training for health care providers (Trollor et al 2016) should devote attention to increased mortality risk among adults with CP or ORDD during the early part of their adult life course, as well as for adults with DS in midlife. In addition, as longevity increases for all adults with developmental disability, it is important to ensure the proper supports necessary for successful transitions into retirement and older age.…”

Attitudes of health care professionals toward people with intellectual disability: a comparison with the general population

“…; Troller et al . ) and their lack of time to allocate to the treatment of more intricate problems (Tuffrey‐Wijne et al . ) may be related issues.…”

A Q‐methodology study among caregivers of people with moderate intellectual disabilities on their clients’ health care: An example in oral health

“…People with intellectual disabilities (ID) tend to have less favourable outcomes with different kinds of health‐related issues compared to their peers without intellectual disabilities (Allerton, Welch, & Emerson, ; van Timmeren et al., ; Trollor et al., ). Reasons for these differences include their dependence on caregivers and the problems these caregivers encounter while providing adequate care.…”