2017
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhx023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Ownership, and Innovation: Evidence from China

Abstract: Using a difference-indifference approach, we study how intellectual property right (IPR) protection affects innovation in China in the years around the privatizations of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Innovation increases after SOE privatizations, and this increase is larger in cities with strong IPR protection. Our results support theoretical arguments that IPR protection strengthens firms' incentives to innovate and that private sector firms are more sensitive to IPR protection than SOEs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, after the confirmation of intellectual property rights, the intensity of innovation increased vigorously [42]. Similarly, in China, after launching IP rights, firms have been motivated to adopt innovative activities [43]. Moreover, with the permission of privatization of SOEs and strengthening of the IP rights, innovation has been enhanced vehemently.…”
Section: Corporate Governance and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, after the confirmation of intellectual property rights, the intensity of innovation increased vigorously [42]. Similarly, in China, after launching IP rights, firms have been motivated to adopt innovative activities [43]. Moreover, with the permission of privatization of SOEs and strengthening of the IP rights, innovation has been enhanced vehemently.…”
Section: Corporate Governance and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, with the permission of privatization of SOEs and strengthening of the IP rights, innovation has been enhanced vehemently. Meanwhile, with the implication of new rules (no tradable to tradable shares), innovation has been endorsed by the top management of Chinese SOEs decisively [43]. On the contrary, high government concentration among state-owned enterprises ((According to Chen [44].…”
Section: Corporate Governance and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firm size was measured by the log transformed (one plus) number of employee (Brancati, 2015). Ownership controlled for sample firm's ownership structure and was a dummy variable, which took on 0 for stateowned firms, and 1 otherwise (Fang, Lerner, & Wu, 2017). Sales was a proxy for the sample firm's market performance and was measured as the log transformation of net sales (de Jong, Verbeke, & Nijssen, 2014).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown et al [23] find that strong shareholder protection and better access to the stock market have a positive impact on innovation investments. Fang et al [24] find that intellectual property rights protection is beneficial to firms' innovative incentives. Aghion et al [25] find an inverted-U relationship between product market competition and innovation.…”
Section: Background Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%