2005
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors

Abstract: The neural basis of variation in human intelligence is not well delineated. Numerous studies relating measures of brain size such as brain weight, head circumference, CT or MRI brain volume to different intelligence test measures, with variously defined samples of subjects have yielded inconsistent findings with correlations from approximately 0 to 0.6, with most correlations approximately 0.3 or 0.4. The study of intelligence in relation to postmortem cerebral volume is not available to date. We report the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
144
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than a spatial-reasoning deficit, this is consistent with employment of a different perceptual strategy in which women more strongly attend to and utilize auditory information. This is consistent with other cognitivereasoning measures that indicate that women perform better on auditory-based tasks, such as language skills (Cahill, 2005;Witelson et al, 2006). In short, the findings are consistent with the conclusion that women do not generally have less spatial-reasoning ability but, rather, a different strategy for allocating resources that more heavily weights audition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather than a spatial-reasoning deficit, this is consistent with employment of a different perceptual strategy in which women more strongly attend to and utilize auditory information. This is consistent with other cognitivereasoning measures that indicate that women perform better on auditory-based tasks, such as language skills (Cahill, 2005;Witelson et al, 2006). In short, the findings are consistent with the conclusion that women do not generally have less spatial-reasoning ability but, rather, a different strategy for allocating resources that more heavily weights audition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Numerous studies have supported gender differences in spatial processing and perception (Arthur, Hancock, & Chrysler, 1997;Cahill, 2005;Linn & Petersen, 1985;McFadden, Henselman, & Zheng, 1999;Ries et al, 2007;Seurinck, Vingerhoets, de Lange, & Achten, 2004;Sholl, 1989;Tremblay & Elliott, 2007;Witelson, Beresh, & Kigar, 2006;Wraga, Duncan, Jacobs, Helt, & Church, 2006;Zuidhoek, Kappers, & Postma, 2007). The general pattern appears to be that males perform better than females on tasks that emphasize visual spatial cues, such as reading maps, whereas, females perform better on tasks that emphasize verbal or other acoustic sensory information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In adult men, volume loss in whole brain, frontal and temporal lobes increases with age, whereas in women, volume loss in hippocampus and parietal lobes increases with age (37). In adult men and women, global grey matter decreases linearly with age with a steeper decline in men (24;38), a finding that has been confirmed postmortem (39). The reasons for these differences are not clear but may be related to the female sex steroids.…”
Section: Sex Differences In Brain Structurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specific features that may affect IQ include the size and shape of the frontal lobes, the amount of blood and chemical activity in the frontal lobes, the total amount of gray matter in the brain, the overall thickness of the cortex and the glucose metabolic rate. Well-functioning pathways correlate to better brain functioning, brain efficiency and information processing, which all point to better IQ scores [15,16]. It should be noted that the correlation with brain size is not simple.…”
Section: Geneticmentioning
confidence: 99%