2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligence and deforestation: International data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to state that fluid intelligence did not explain any of the variance in connectedness to nature. Even if relations between intelligence and environmental issues were substained in some studies (Jones and Podemska, 2010; Salahodjaev, 2016), fluid intelligence didn’t emerged related to connectedness to nature in this study. Regarding personality, in the present study connectedness to nature was associated to personality traits, particularly to Agreeableness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to state that fluid intelligence did not explain any of the variance in connectedness to nature. Even if relations between intelligence and environmental issues were substained in some studies (Jones and Podemska, 2010; Salahodjaev, 2016), fluid intelligence didn’t emerged related to connectedness to nature in this study. Regarding personality, in the present study connectedness to nature was associated to personality traits, particularly to Agreeableness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Regarding environmental issues, there is a growing literature on ecological dimension of intelligence in terms of social development and cognitive patterns of human development (Gifford et al, 2011; Salahodjaev, 2016). A recent study (Salahodjaev, 2016) offers for example new statistical evidences of a negative link between intelligence and deforestation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the same time, more intelligent bureaucrats were found to be more supportive of policies resulting in larger and prospective rewards rather than smaller but immediate ones. Indeed, recent cross-national evidence provides further support to the idea that high-IQ societies are characterized by more rational and efficient use of natural resources that improve the quality of life (Salahodjaev, 2016b). Considering that air pollution (resulting from increased carbon dioxide emissions) is currently one of the most challenging issues in sustainable development agenda, while problem solving abilities are heavily related to the level of intelligence (Burns et al, 2006); it is interesting to investigate the relation between the level of intelligence and carbon dioxide emissions across countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%